Skip to main content

Association of perceived life satisfaction with attitudes toward life-sustaining treatment among the elderly in South Korea: a cross-sectional study



Amidst rapid population aging, South Korea enacted the Well-dying Act, late among advanced countries, but public opinion on the act is not still clear. Against this background, this study aims to: 1) investigate factors affecting elderly individuals’ attitude toward life-sustaining treatment, and 2) examine whether attitude toward life-sustaining treatment is related to their perceived life satisfaction.


Data from the 2020 Survey of Living Conditions and Welfare Needs of Korean Older Persons were used. There were 9,916 participants (3,971 males; 5,945 females). We used multivariable-adjusted Poisson regression models with robust variance to examine the association between perceived life satisfaction and attitude toward life-sustaining treatment and calculate prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).


After adjusting potential confounders, the probabilities that the elderly who were dissatisfied with their current life would favor life-sustaining treatment were 1.52 times (95% CI: 1.15–1.64) and 1.28 times (95% CI: 1.09–1.51) higher for men and women, respectively, than the elderly who were satisfied. In addition, attitudes in favor of life-sustaining treatment were observed prominently among the elderly with long schooling years or high household income, when they were dissatisfied with their life.


Our results suggested that for the elderly, life satisfaction is an important factor influencing how they exercise their autonomy and rights regarding dying well and receiving life-sustaining treatment. It is necessary to introduce interventions that would enhance the life satisfaction of the elderly and terminally ill patients and enable them to make their own decisions according to the values of life.

Peer Review reports


The increase in discussions on end-of-life care, including hospice palliative care and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (LST), is closely linked to population aging [1]. In particular, Korea is the fastest aging country in the world, and as of January 2022, the proportion of the elderly population is close to 17.5% [2], which falls within the classification of an aged society.

Rapid population aging has caused many problems, such as making elderly patients and their families suffer pain and disability for a long time until death, and greatly increasing the economic burden of LST [3]. Against this background, interest in process of choosing death or LST according to the right to self-determination and actively preparing for death throughout life has increased worldwide [4]. Similarly, in Korea, a new turning point in end-of-life care has arrived with the ‘Hospice/Palliative Care Act’ and the so-called ‘Well-dying Act’ which came into force in 2018 [1, 5, 6]. In Korean Society, well-dying is defined as a concept with the attributes such as reflection on death, acceptance of death, advance care planning, and transcendence [7]. The main content of this act is that LST against the patient's will can be stopped at any time [8].

LST is defined as any treatment that serves to prolong life without reversing the underlying medical condition and includes processes such as mechanical ventilation, renal dialysis, chemotherapy, antibiotics, and artificial nutrition and hydration [9, 10]. The relevant Acts aim to protect the best interests of the patients and respect their self-determinants rights [11]. In countries where well-dying related legislation was implemented earlier, there have been numerous studies and interventions on LST. Patients’ perceptions of end-of-life care [12, 13], as well as related physicians’ orders [14, 15], and ethical considerations [16, 17] were discussed. The issue of forgoing LST is par important for critically ill patients or elderly people on the brink of death. Thus, a number of studies have reported on LST preferences for patients in the intensive care unit or suffering from terminal illness [18,19,20].

However, in Korea, not long after the Well-dying Act was enacted, societal consensus is still in the process of developing, so there are not many preceding studies examining the perceptions of seriously ill patients and the elderly toward preparation for death or receiving LST [1, 11]. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate factors affecting decision making about LST among the Korean elderly and, in particular, examine the association between perceived life satisfaction and attitudes toward LST.


Data and study population

The data analysed in this study was taken from the 2020 Survey of Living Conditions and Welfare Needs of Korean Older Persons, a nationwide time-series survey of non-institutionalized older adults aged 65 or over residing in South Korea [21]. In abidance with the Elderly Welfare Act, the Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs has been conducting this survey every three years since 2008 [22].

To inform welfare policies and respond to an aging society, this survey included questionnaire items regarding elderly individuals’ living arrangements, physical and mental health, healthcare use, and attitude toward death and LST [21]. No further ethical approval was required as informed consent was obtained from all participants and the data was publicly accessible [22].

The total survey population from the 2020 survey included 10,097 individuals. After excluding missing data (N = 181), responses from 9,916 participants (3,971 males; 5,945 females) comprised the study sample.


The dependent variable was the attitude toward LST, which was asked through the question, ‘Would you prefer to receive life-sustaining treatment when you are unconscious or when staying alive is very difficult?’ It was a 5-point scale item, with 1 indicating ‘strongly agree’ and 5 indicating ‘strongly disagree’. Analyses were performed by categorizing 1 to 3 points as ‘agree’ and 4 to 5 points as ‘disagree’.

The main variable of interest in this study was the perceived life satisfaction of the elderly. Each participant was asked: ‘How satisfied are you with your current life in general?’ with the responses on a 5-point scale where 1 meant ‘very satisfied’ and 5 meant ‘very dissatisfied’. The responses were classified into two categories: 1 to 3 points meant ‘satisfied’ and 4 to 5 points indicated ‘dissatisfied’.

We controlled for covariates such as socioeconomic and health-related factors as potential confounders. Socioeconomic factors included sex, age, marital status, region, schooling years, and household income. Additionally, variables regarding health behavioural patterns included smoking, drinking, and physical exercise. The presence of the big five chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory disease, cancer, and stroke [23] and subjective health status was also corrected.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were shown as frequencies (N) and percentages (%), and chi-squared test was conducted to investigate and compare the general characteristics of the study population. Subsequently, multivariable-adjusted Poisson regression models with robust variance were used to examine factors associated with attitude toward LST and calculate prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) [24,25,26,27]. For all analyses, we used SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA); p-values less than 0.05 were deemed statistically significant.


Table 1 shows the general characteristics of the population divided between those who were satisfied or dissatisfied with their current life. Of the 9,916 individuals included in this study, 3,971 (40.0%) were men and 5,945 (60.0%) were women. Among all participants, those who answered that they were satisfied with their current life accounted for 51.8% (N = 5,140), and those who answered that they were dissatisfied accounted for 48.2% (N = 4,776). In addition, 86.4% (N = 8,568) of the participants expressed opposition to LST, and only 13.6% (N = 1,348) were in favour of it.

Table 1 General characteristics of the study population

Table 2 presents the results of the multivariate Poisson regression models with robust variance, with attitudes in favour of LST as the outcome. As a result, the association between perceived life satisfaction and attitude toward LST among Korean older adults was identified. When all potential confounding variables were adjusted, the participants dissatisfied with their lives were more likely to agree to LST than the satisfied elderly, and the adjusted PR for men and women was found to be 1.52 (95% CI: 1.15–1.64) and 1.28 (95% CI: 1.09–1.51), respectively. Similarly, as shown in Supplementary table 1, in overall analysis of men and women, life satisfaction was found to be a factor related to the attitudes toward LST (Adjusted PR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.22–1.55).

Table 2 Results of factors associated with attitudes in favor of life-sustaining treatment

Additionally, we conducted subgroup analysis stratified by socioeconomic factors, such as age, region, schooling years, and household income, because it was expected that factors would affect the perception of LST among the elderly. As noted in Table 3, significant associations were prominent in the relatively young elderly aged 65 to 74 (Men, Adjusted PR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.37–2.12; Women, Adjusted PR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.19–1.74), and the urban dweller group (Men, Adjusted PR: 2.20, 95% CI: 1.71–2.82; Women, Adjusted PR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.06–1.70). In the case of the elderly with a long schooling period of more than 7 years, it was confirmed that the probability of favouring LST was statistically significantly higher when they were dissatisfied with their life (Men, Adjusted PR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.44–2.20; Women, Adjusted PR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.13–1.80). Similarly, the elderly with the highest income level were found to be more likely to agree to LST when they felt dissatisfied with their life. The statistical significance of the tertile 3 group (highest earner) was found to be common in all sexes (Men, Adjusted PR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.49–2.66; Women, Adjusted PR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.30–2.27).

Table 3 Results of subgroup analysis stratified by socioeconomic factors


The Well-dying Act that allows patients with no possibility of rehabilitation to withhold or withdraw LST with their own decision or family consent has been enforced in Korea since 2018 [5, 6]. Although still in the transitional phase, 86.4% of the participants expressed opposition to LST, and with only 13.6% in favour of it. After adjusting several covariates such as socioeconomic and health-related factors, it was found that elderly people’s satisfaction with life was related to their attitude toward LST.

For patients on the verge of death, LST is a self-determinant right, so it is difficult to say which decision is more correct, and it must be interpreted carefully. In this context, this study focused on examining factors affecting elderly individuals’ attitude toward LST at the time of end-of-life. Summarizing the key findings of our study, the elderly who feel satisfied with life are more likely to withhold or withdraw LST by themselves according to the purpose of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act. Perhaps we would expect that people who are dissatisfied with their current life will stop LST, but the opposite association was drawn. These results suggest that the elderly who are satisfied with their life are more likely to make a decision to withhold or withdraw the LST by writing an advance decision on LST based on more rational thinking, not that they are no longer willing to maintain their lives. On the other hand, the elderly who are dissatisfied with their current life may have more regrets for the rest of their life.

One interesting finding was that the presence or absence of big 5 chronic diseases was not a statistically significant factor influencing LST preference. This suggests that, in addition to health status, various socioeconomic factors of the elderly have a greater influence on LST determination. In addition, if the elderly of relatively young age group, living in an urban area, a long schooling years, or a high household income were dissatisfied with their life, they were more likely to approve of LST. These findings suggest that life satisfaction is an important factor in exercising the right to determine LST at end-of-life, even if socioeconomic conditions are relatively better. Therefore, interventions to increase elderly's life satisfaction will be needed so that elderly patients on the verge of death can make their own decisions about LST.

There have been several previous studies and interventions on the attitude toward end-of-life care [20] and LST [13, 17, 28, 29] in general patients and the elderly. Similar to this study, some studies investigated the effects of depression [30] and perceived quality of life [31] on the decision regarding LST in the elderly. They have reported that the elderly who were not depressed or had higher perceived quality of life were more likely to withdraw from LST, which is consistent with our main findings. However, in South Korea, as the Well-Dying Act and Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision Act were implemented fairly recently, most of the preceding studies discussed the implication [32] and current status of the Act [1, 5, 6], so there was an insufficient number of prior studies to which we could refer. Therefore, our study is different in that it explored factors affecting LST preference, which is emerging as an important issue in the rapidly aging population, using the most recent survey data for the elderly officially conducted in Korea.

This study had certain limitations. First, issues related to LST may be more focused on patients with severe diseases or the elderly who are on the verge of death, but it was not possible to separate these subjects and conduct additional analysis. To compensate for this limitation, the prevalence of the big five chronic diseases defined by the World Health Organization [23] was corrected as a covariate. Second, since this study was a cross-sectional study based on the latest 2020 data, the association was confirmed, but causality was not confirmed. Therefore, an additional longitudinal study on changes in participants’ attitudes towards LST should be conducted in severely ill patients or the elderly. Third, even after adjusting for numerous covariates that may affect the dependent variable, there will still be potential confounding effects from the unmeasurable variables.


Our findings identified a positive association between elderly people’s satisfaction with their current lives and their attitude toward withdrawing LST. Since it is desirable that the forgoing or withdrawal of LST depend on the decisions of the elderly and patients themselves, ways to improve perceived life satisfaction should be sought so that the right to self-determination can be exercised correctly.

Availability of data and materials

The data is publicly accessible on the website of Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs (


  1. Lee JE, Goo AJ, Cho BL. The current status of end-of-life care in Korea and legislation of well-dying act. J Korean Geriatr Soc. 2016;20(2):65–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Statistics Korea. Population projections [Internet]. Accessed on 09 Feb 2022. Available at

  3. Sprung CL. Changing attitudes and practices in forgoing life-sustaining treatments. JAMA. 1990;263(16):2211–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim S, Tak SH. Family Members’ Knowledge and Attitude Toward Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions for Patients in the Intensive Care Unit. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2021;23(3):256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim HJ, Kim YJ, Kwon JH, Won Y-W, Lee HY, Baek SK, Ryu H, Kim DY. Current status and cardinal features of patient autonomy after enactment of the life-sustaining treatment decisions act in Korea. Cancer Research and Treatment: Official Journal of Korean Cancer Association. 2021;53(4):917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Won Y-W, Kim HJ, Kwon JH, Lee HY, Baek SK, Kim YJ, Kim DY, Ryu H. Life-sustaining treatment states in Korean cancer patients after enforcement of act on decisions on life-sustaining treatment for patients at the end of life. Cancer Research and Treatment: Official Journal of Korean Cancer Association. 2021;53(4):908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim G, Park Y-H. Concept Analysis of Well-dying in Korean Society. Journal of muscle and joint health. 2020;27(3):229–37.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee JE, Goo AJ, Cho BL. The Current Status of End-of-Life Care in Korea and Legislation of Well-Dying Act. J Korean Geriatr Soc. 2016;20(2):65–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. American Medical Association: AMA Code of Medical Ethics’ opinions on care at the end of life. AMA Journal of Ethics: Iluminating the Art of Medicine. 2013;15(12):1038–40.

  10. Ko DN, Blinderman CD: Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment (including artificial nutrition and hydration). Oxford Textbook of Palliative Medicine. 2015. pp. 323-34.

  11. Yoo SH, Choi W, Kim Y, Kim MS, Park HY, Keam B, Heo DS. Difficulties doctors experience during life-sustaining treatment discussion after enactment of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act: A cross-sectional study. Cancer Research and Treatment: Official Journal of Korean Cancer Association. 2021;53(2):584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sandsdalen T, Rystedt I, Grøndahl VA, Hov R, Høye S, Wilde-Larsson B. Patients’ perceptions of palliative care: adaptation of the Quality from the Patient’s Perspective instrument for use in palliative care, and description of patients’ perceptions of care received. BMC Palliat Care. 2015;14(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lo B, McLeod GA, Saika G. Patient attitudes to discussing life-sustaining treatment. Arch Intern Med. 1986;146(8):1613–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fromme EK, Zive D, Schmidt TA, Cook JN, Tolle SW. Association between physician orders for life-sustaining treatment for scope of treatment and in-hospital death in Oregon. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(7):1246–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hickman SE, Nelson CA, Moss AH, Hammes BJ, Terwilliger A, Jackson A, Tolle SW. Use of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) paradigm program in the hospice setting. J Palliat Med. 2009;12(2):133–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Savulescu J, Vergano M, Craxì L, Wilkinson D. An ethical algorithm for rationing life-sustaining treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125(3):253–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Reynolds S, Cooper AB, McKneally M. Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: ethical considerations. Surgical Clinics. 2007;87(4):919–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Garrett JM, Harris RP, Norburn JK, Patrick DL, Danis M. Life-sustaining treatments during terminal illness. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8(7):361–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Devictor D, Latour JM, Tissieres P. Forgoing life-sustaining or death-prolonging therapy in the pediatric ICU. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2008;55(3):791–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Burns JP, Mitchell C, Outwater KM, Geller M, Griffith JL, Todres ID, Truog RD. End-of-life care in the pediatric intensive care unit after the forgoing of life-sustaining treatment. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(8):3060–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim G, Lee M-A. Age discrimination and suicidal ideation among Korean older adults. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020;28(7):748–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Baek JY, Lee E, Jung H-W, Jang I-Y. Geriatrics fact sheet in Korea 2021. Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2021;25(2):65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. World Health Organization: Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010: World Health Organization; 2011.

  24. Huang FL: Alternatives to logistic regression models in experimental studies. J Exp Educ. 2022;90(1):213-28.

  25. Jang S-Y, Jang S-I, Bae H-C, Shin J, Park E-C. Sex differences associated with hepatitis B virus surface antigen seropositivity unwareness in hepatitis B virus surface antigen-positive adults: 2007–2012 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Prev Med Public Health. 2015;48(2):74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Spiegelman D, Hertzmark E. Easy SAS calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162(3):199–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zou G. A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(7):702–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hui E, Ho SC, Tsang J, Lee S, Woo J. Attitudes toward life-sustaining treatment of older persons in Hong Kong. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45(10):1232–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kellogg FR, Crain M, Corwin J, Brickner PW. Life-sustaining interventions in frail elderly persons: talking about choices. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152(11):2317–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee MA, Ganzini L. Depression in the elderly: Effect on patient attitudes toward life-sustaining therapy. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40(10):983–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Uhlmann RF, Pearlman RA. Perceived quality of life and preferences for life-sustaining treatment in older adults. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151(3):495–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim JS, Yoo SH, Choi W, Kim Y, Hong J, Kim MS, Park HY, Keam B, Heo DS. Implication of the life-sustaining treatment decisions act on end-of-life care for Korean terminal patients. Cancer research and treatment: official journal of Korean Cancer Association. 2020;52(3):917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank the members of the Institute of Health Services Research at Yonsei University for their advice for the further development of this study.


No funding to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Il Yun made a substantial contribution to the concept or design of the work; Il Yun and Hyunkyu Kim contributed to the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data; Il Yun, Eun-cheol Park, and Suk-Yong Jang drafted the article or revised it critically for important intellectual content. All authors approved the version to be published and participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suk-Yong Jang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the data used were approved by the Institutional Review Board installed in Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs (IRB No. 2020–36). There are no further ethical requirements as participants obtained written informed consent prior to conducting the survey.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

No competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Supplementary Table1. Results of factors associated with attitudes in favor of life-sustaining treatment (overall analysis of men and women).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yun, I., Kim, H., Park, EC. et al. Association of perceived life satisfaction with attitudes toward life-sustaining treatment among the elderly in South Korea: a cross-sectional study. BMC Palliat Care 21, 184 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Life-sustaining treatment
  • Well-dying
  • End-of-life care
  • Life Satisfaction
  • Self-determinants right