Skip to main content

Challenges and coping strategies when caring for terminally ill persons with cancer: perspectives of family caregivers

Abstract

Introduction

Terminal illness is an irreversible illness that, without life-sustaining procedures, usually results in death or permanent disability from which recovery is unlikely. When involved, family caregivers are believed to improve health outcomes, such as reduced hospitalization, and establishing a patient’s initial access to professional treatment services. However, caring for a patient with a terminal illness is viewed as one of the most difficult aspects of providing care. This study aimed to identify the challenges, and coping strategies developed by family caregivers to cope with the care of the terminally ill person.

Methods

An exploratory descriptive qualitative approach was used. Twenty (20) family caregivers voluntarily participated in the study from the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the participants. The transcribed interviews were then analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

From the analysis, three main themes emerged: challenges, coping strategies, and social support. These themes encompassed sixteen subthemes including financial burden, bad health conditions, faith and prayer, and support from health professionals. From the study, both male and female family caregivers narrated that providing care for sick relatives undergoing terminal disease is characterized as a daily duty demanding one’s time and fraught with emotional strain. In addition, even though it was a difficult job, family members who provided care for ailing relatives never gave up, citing responsibility, the importance of family, and religious beliefs as the primary motivations for doing so.

Conclusion

The difficulties and demands of family caregiving roles for terminally ill relatives are complex and multifactorial. The findings call for multidisciplinary professional attention for family caregivers and policies that will support their lives holistically.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) [1] advises that patients with terminal illnesses receive palliative care to maximize their quality of life. According to the American Cancer Society [2], terminal illness is an irreversible condition that, without treatment, will certainly cause death soon or leave the patient in a permanently disabled state from which recovery is uncertain. One thing that stands out globally is the growing burden of a terminal illness and the possible strain it places on caregivers. In persons 70 years or older, the terminal illness burden is expected to rise by 183% between 2016 and 2060 [3]. Additionally, they predicted that by 2060, the current burden of terminal illness would have doubled, with low- and middle-income countries like Ghana experiencing the highest growth due to the adoption of certain lifestyles, especially dietary.

This provision of palliative care to terminally ill patients in high-income countries comparable to that of LMICs is wide. For example, Quinn et al. [4] revealed that most terminally ill patients in Canada receive palliative care compared to Pinto et al. [5] assertion that, only 17% of terminal illnesses adults in LMICs have access to palliative care. Several circumstances have been identified to hamper access to high-quality palliative care at LMICs. Among the factors is the key role of the family caregivers in a multidisciplinary team in ensuring that the terminally ill patient access palliative or end-of-life care [6, 7]. A multidisciplinary team approach is necessary for the care of terminally ill patients to maximize comfort by decreasing pain and attending to their physical, social, psychological, and spiritual needs [8, 9]. Members of the multidisciplinary team may include doctors, nurses, allied health professionals, volunteers, and family caregivers [10]. Especially in Ghana where the family plays a pivotal role in the care of ailing persons, family caregivers are very instrumental [11, 12]. Considering the inadequate staff on duty at a time, family members in most hospitals in Ghana, are directly involved in the personal care and sometimes feeding of patients [11,12,13,14].

Family caregivers are partners, relatives, or friends who devote significant time to providing healthcare over months or years and take on various physically, socially, emotionally, or financially taxing activities [15, 16]. Family caregivers provide care and support to patients who are terminally ill, yet doing so can harm their physical, psychological, and social well-being [7, 8, 17]. Effective family involvement in patient-centred care improves the standard of care provided [7, 8, 16,17,18].

Caregiving includes everything from helping the care recipient with everyday tasks and giving them direct care to navigating the complicated healthcare and social services systems. As an extension of the healthcare system and home-based care coordinators, family carers provide care [8, 19, 20] and perform all therapeutic and complex medical tasks, including ensuring effective adherence to treatment regimens [21]. Family involvement in health and medical tasks at home is not new, but it has become more common [22].

Several factors may influence family involvement in the care of the terminally ill. Stomski and Morrison [23] highlighted that involving family members could improve treatment decision-making by reducing communication barriers and emphasizing the needs of terminally ill patients and their caregivers. Caregivers usually establish a patient’s initial access to professional treatment services.

In Ghana, family caregivers have a particular set of challenges. While families in Ghana are becoming more nuclear and family support is decreasing [24], care for an ill family member still needs to be provided [24,25,26]. According to Shields [27], the degree or character of the family relationship influences family members’ willingness to participate as well as provide care [27]. In addition, financial issues, the caregiver’s health, connectedness, type of illness, and status of employment of the caregiver can all be considered [27, 28]. Despite the supportive role of family caregivers, various factors such as social expectations, the nature of family bonds, beliefs, and culture [29, 30] influence the involvement decision in various jurisdictions.

Numerous family members are usually delighted to assist [31] their ageing or ailing loved ones with the many health problems they encounter [28, 32]. However, these family caregivers are faced with several challenges that encompass their coping strategies, the dual system of rendering care as low-income countries are short-staffed, and their dual roles as caregivers in hospitals and at home [24,25,26, 33,34,35]. Essentially, the role of caring for family members may have both positive and negative ramifications that are far-reaching and ongoing for this category of caregivers [36]. Even though caregiving can be rewarding, it could cause significant disruptions to their lives and those closest to them, as caregiving demand can increase over time [37, 38].

Family involvement in the care of the terminally ill, especially the challenges they face and how they cope with these challenges in Ghana, is a grey area. The study aimed to identify the challenges family caregivers face and how they cope with the care of patients with terminal illnesses who are on admission or have been recently discharged at a teaching hospital in Ghana.

Methods

Design and setting

An exploratory descriptive qualitative approach was used to explore the in-depth experiences in-depth descriptions of the challenges and coping strategies of family caregivers for people with terminal illnesses. The goal of this design is to identify the characteristics of experiences that members of a specific demographic share. The study was carried out in the palliative care unit at the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH) family medicine department in Accra, Ghana. The KBTH serves as the main referral centre for southern Ghana and beyond.

Population

The study focused on adult family caregivers who were the main caregivers for patients at the palliative care centre of the Family Medicine Department. Participants in this study were required to meet certain requirements to participate.

Inclusion criteria

Any individual between the ages of 18 and 50 years, who takes care of his or her sick relative (whether in the nuclear or extended family; brother, mother, father sister, aunt, uncle, grandparents, or in-laws) who has a been diagnosed as having a terminal illness, that is one without cure, such as end-stage renal failure and advanced cancer (metastasized), and family caregivers caring for ill relatives for at least three months were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Participants who did not meet the selection criteria included family members of ill relatives receiving chemotherapy during the same period of the study, family members who did not live in the same house as the terminally ill relative, and family caregivers who were unwilling to participate.

Data collection

To learn more about the participants’ challenges and coping mechanisms, a semi-structured interview guide with open-ended questions guided the conversation with each family caregiver. The first part of the guide gathered participant background data, including gender, age, educational attainment, employment status, and the duration of the care of the terminally ill family member. With the permission of each interviewee, audio recordings were made with an MP3 recorder, pen, and field notebook.

Family caregivers were identified at the Family Medicine Department of the KBTH when they came with their terminally ill relative to the unit for palliative care. Twenty-three (23) informal caregivers were identified as “family caregivers” and were given verbal and written information about the study and invited to participate. After reading through the consent form and explaining it verbally, twenty-two (22) family caregivers agreed and signed the consent document and indicated their interest in participating. After trying several times to book a date for the interview, 2 participants were never available. A total of 20 participants were interviewed. Participants included spouses, relatives, and relatives-in-law who were 18 years or older and provided care at home for their relatives with terminal illnesses such as advanced cancers or renal failure. The study was conducted following the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki for human research.

A semi-structured interview guide (see Appendix 1) was developed through literature and the adaptation of some questions from the palliative caregivers’ assessment tools [39] The interviews were conducted between April to July 2022. The conversations during the interview sessions were recorded with the consent of participants and later transcribed. Local languages (Akan and Ga languages) were used for participants who could not express themselves in English. The interviewer was fluent in both languages and transcribed such recordings with the last author to be sure the exact meanings were transcribed. To ensure that events were recorded consistently, an observation guide was implemented. The interviews took between 45 min and an hour per participant; the family caregivers were given some time, anywhere from 10 to 40 min, to deal with the reality of the situation when they were getting too emotional before resuming the conversation from where they had left off. Hence, some interviews lasted over an hour and a half whenever the participant became emotional. Data saturation was reached after the 20th participant, but 2 additional participants were being contacted to have their interviews done as they had already consented but were unavailable. As part of protection for participants’ vulnerability, psychological support care services were made available at the hospital.

Data analysis

The analysis of the data in this study was conducted using the concepts of thematic analysis as outlined by Miles and Huberman [40]. This included data reduction, displaying the results, drawing conclusions, and verifying the results. Also, we addressed the issue of trustworthiness in the study to uphold the rigor of the qualitative research. Trustworthiness in qualitative research was established throughout the study by ensuring credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability [41].

For analysis, the recorded Akan and Ga interviews were transcribed with the help of a translator (without identifying the source of the data), and these transcriptions were examined with the participants to ensure that they were accurate representations of their descriptions. Alongside this process, field notes were also generated. After transcription, the transcripts were exported to the MAXQDA 2020 edition for analysis. One of the co-authors independently examined the transcripts. Then, two more authors received the findings and worked together to cross-check, discuss, and decide on themes and sub-themes. The authors were the only persons with access to the interview sessions. The data were stored in a computer protected by a password. Audio recordings will be destroyed five years after this study is completed and published.

Results

Analysis showed that most family caregivers for patients with terminal illnesses were females (15). The male caregivers were either a spouse, a son, or a brother to a patient. Regarding the employment status of the caregivers, 15 of the participants were employed. The age range of family caregivers was between 28 and 58 years old. Regarding the participants’ religious backgrounds, 17 were Christians. The demographic characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1, while Table 2 shows the characteristics of the patients they cared for. Data was analyzed, and the results were presented based on the themes and emerging sub-themes. Three (3) primary themes and sixteen sub-themes emerged from the subjective accounts of the experiences of the family caregivers. However, the focus of this article is the 3 main themes. The themes and their sub-themes, and the quotes are presented in Tables 3 and 4, and 5.

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of participants
Table 2 Distribution of patient characteristics
Table 3 Sub-themes and some participants’ quotes from the theme Burden and challenges
Table 4 Sub-themes and some participants’ quotes from the theme coping strategies
Table 5 Sub-themes and some participants’ quotes from the theme of social support

Discussion

This study aimed to identify the challenges and coping strategies developed by family caregivers to cope with the care of the terminally ill person. Out of the themes that emerged, we observed patterns of family caregivers’ challenges, coping strategies, and social support. As part of family caregivers’ challenges, seeing a loved one at the end of their life can be stressful and daunting. In the Ghanaian setup, most family caregivers are immediate relatives of the terminally ill patient. The analysis of the data shows that family caregivers are under pressure to take care of their sick loved ones and deal with a variety of responsibilities and challenges. This included debt, exhaustion, anxiety, and occasionally even health problems. Additionally, research indicates that carers experience family conflicts, social isolation, and a lack of understanding of the management pathway [6, 7, 9, 42, 43]. Most participants claimed they were happy to care for their relative despite all the challenges stated, but they did acknowledge there were occasions when they wanted to quit. These findings align with the findings of studies [44, 45] conducted in Ghana among family caregivers of people living with chronic conditions like mental illness.

In the current study, most family caregivers were female spouses, daughters, or sons of the care recipient. This is consistent with the conclusions of studies done by Ocansey et al., [45] and Kyei-Arthur and Codjoe [46], which showed that women are more likely than men to care for terminally sick family members. Furthermore, cultural norms that consider providing care to be a feminine responsibility [46,47,48] are more likely to be in Africa [49, 50]. Countries and cultures like Ghana uphold the traditional role of the woman as the primary caregiver [48]. Despite this, in recent times, more males are assuming caregiving roles, particularly husbands and sometimes sons [51,52,53]. This is reflected in the current study, in which four males took on the caregiving roles as the care recipient’s sons, brother, and husband. Thus, the male involvement in the care of terminally ill relatives shows a changing social norm in Ghana regarding the perception that the caregiver role is primarily reserved for females.

Taking care of family members with terminal illnesses, as depicted by the participants in the study, is not an easy task. The responsibilities they had assumed significantly impacted each participant’s personal life. This is supported by studies by Irfan et al. [54], Pope et al. [55], Ajibade et al. [56], and Bouldin et al. [57] that looked at family caregivers and found that they experienced personal life effects, financial difficulties, and decreased work productivity because of their role as caregivers. Participants in this study said they did not receive enough sleep to replenish the energy they had lost throughout the day. This resulted in ongoing weariness. Participants acknowledged that a main source of stress for them is their health decline. The stress and exhaustion they experienced because of their duties as caretakers had a detrimental effect on their health. They indicated they had started having knee discomfort, backaches, and hypertension. Long-term exposure to stress brought on by the duties of caregiving [58, 59] may have an impact on the daily operations of the family as well as the health of its members, according to research done by Ocansey et al. [45]. Similarly, it has been demonstrated in recent studies by Roth et al. [60] and Irfan et al. [54] that physically demanding caregiving roles might have a detrimental effect on caregivers’ health.

The participants’ social lives were disturbed because of the type of caregiving role they performed, which made it impossible for them to move around or participate in scheduled activities and events. The health of their ailing relatives led participants to admit that they frequently forbade visitors from visiting their homes. Their participation in social activities was impacted by this. Even if it were possible, they wouldn’t be able to take pleasure in the social activity since they wouldn’t feel at ease. This was in line with a study conducted by Lu et al. [50] in which family carers regarded their caregiving duties as “living on the edge and being prisoners in their own lives”. This finding is consistent with a previous study by Cleary et al. [61], which found that carers faced a great deal of instability, a rapid loss of health, and feelings of isolation.

The caregiving responsibilities can also impact family connections and life quality [62, 63]. The carers’ roles greatly impacted the connections between the family members. Maintaining open lines of communication while having time for their partners and children proved to be a huge challenge for them. As a result, family caregivers sacrificed their time, finances, and relationships with their children, spouses, and social aspects of their lives as they provided care. Participants complained that their caring tasks were so challenging that they were too worn out to carry on with their daily activities and care for their families. This supported a study by Pope et al. [55] that found that most family carers struggle to balance their multiple tasks, especially young adult caregivers who face the rare burden of caring for a family member while also meeting developmental milestones.

This challenge was compounded by the lack of knowledge on the condition of ill relatives. Participants lamented that health professionals hardly told them about the treatment modalities and progress of their ill relatives. They felt they were always kept in the dark and could not ask questions for fear of the outcome either to them or their relative. This supports a study by Tarberg et al. [18] on the “silent voices of caregivers”. In their study, Ullrich et al. [63] also noted that the knowledge demands of family carers were the highest. Their participants sought truthful answers to their questions, updates on changes in the patient’s condition, and information on exactly what was being done to the patient.

Aside the challenges, participants devised ways to cope with their current situations. One way to describe coping is as a person’s reaction to upsetting situations. From this study, family caregivers made use of music, video chats, relaxation, situational adaptability, and faith and prayer. One important feature of the study, video calls, was unique from those found in past studies. According to Cook et al. [64], Kim, & Dvorak [65], and Ter Bogt et al. [66] people use music as a coping method. People engage in this behaviour to maintain emotional control. Listening to music regularly can help people control their effects, regulate their emotions, and boost problem-solving skills [65, 66]. The current study participants reported utilizing music as a coping mechanism to help them manage their stress. This confirms a study by Pouraboli et al. [67], which indicated that participation in a relaxation program offered to a group of parents whose children were suffering from cancer effectively lowered their stress levels. Nyante and Carpenter [68] and Gómez-Zúñiga, et al., [69] claim that family caregivers, especially parents, use their religious or spiritual pursuits as a coping mechanism to get through their trying experiences. This was made possible by having hope in spirituality, having confidence in God, and praying. Similarly, it came to light throughout this research that the participants expressed all hope in their faith, prayed regularly following their religious customs, and had complete faith in God or Allah. The act of faith was consistent with the conviction that only God has the power to heal and that all other attempts are futile in the absence of him. It was observed that prayer, religious practice, and religious expression were all interwoven as sources of inspiration [69, 70]. It also revealed how the road of caregiving was created by strength and faith, which enabled and sustained it. The participants also mentioned that they were able to stay focused and avoid being sidetracked because of their faith in God. This tendency toward optimism seems to be what drives volunteers to keep helping the afflicted and offering whatever support is required. Support for family caregivers of people with terminal illness is a challenge for most professional care providers, due to the nature of the disease progression [71]. Many people would not be able to be cared for at home throughout their final illness if they did not have the support of their family [72]. However, in this study, the findings revealed family caregivers were supported in several ways. Families assisted in providing support to their relatives who served as caregivers. Other family members, religious leaders, and healthcare professionals provided support. However, participants were assisted financially to some extent, though it was revealed that in some cases, it wasn’t enough. Financial compensation for caregiving was deemed to be the most essential kind of support for family caregivers [12]. Support with house chores, cooking, and other errands was provided. This supported a research conducted by [72]which identified that people are more likely to turn to their families for social support in the forms of money, medical care, and other resources than to their communities. In addition, this study is consistent with the findings of a study conducted by Xiuxiang, et al. [73]. in which participants stated that informal support from other family members was available throughout their caregiving role due to filial piety. Every person who holds a religious belief is required to pray regularly [74]. Support from religious groups and representatives was not left out. The research found that they assisted with prayers. Occasionally, representatives from the religious groups were dispatched on behalf of their leaders to help participants and ailing relatives in prayer. This gave the participants additional energy and comfort as they were supported. Words of encouragement were given to cheer them up.

Implications for practice

The results of this study support the necessity for well-organized palliative care services in underdeveloped nations. The link between palliative services and the needs of caregivers could be established by providing holistic, patient-centered care that focuses not only on the patients but also on the family caregivers. Consequently, the palliative care teams must include multidisciplinary professionals like medical, nursing, social workers, and psychologists who provide emotional and psychosocial support to patients and their caregivers. Coping with the challenges of caring for a terminally ill loved one can be emotionally taxing, and these support services can help caregivers navigate their feelings and concerns. Although health professionals are aware of what palliative care is, its application to the latter still leaves a lot to be desired.

Strengths and limitations

This study offers a thorough grasp of the difficulties caregivers face and the accessible support systems that can improve their well-being by examining the burden felt by family caregivers of patients with terminal illnesses and proposing helpful coping strategies. Notwithstanding the relevant findings from our study, our inclusion lumped family caregivers of sick relatives diagnosed with terminal illnesses of all conditions at the Palliative Care Unit. It is possible that selecting a specific condition might have shed more light on such conditions than putting them together. Besides, findings from our study can ultimately influence the creation of programs and regulations to provide better support for family caregivers throughout their caregiving journey.

Data availability

Data and recordings are kept on a drive safely with the corresponding author.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Integrating palliative care and symptom relief into the response to humanitarian emergencies and crises: a WHO guide. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2018. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/274565 [Accessed 23 April 2022].

  2. American Cancer Society. (2022) https://www.cancer.org/treatment/children-and-cancer/when-a-family-member-has-cancer/dealing-with-parents-terminal-illness.html. Accessed on 18 June 2022.

  3. Sleeman KE, De Brito M, Etkind S, Nkhoma K, Guo P, Higginson IJ, Harding R. The escalating global burden of serious health-related suffering: projections to 2060 by world regions, age groups, and health conditions. Lancet Global Health. 2019;7(7):e883–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Quinn, K. L., Stukel, T., Stall, N. M., Huang, A., Isenberg, S., Tanuseputro, P.,… Bell, C. M. (2020). Association between palliative care and healthcare outcomes among adults with terminal non-cancer illness: population-based matched cohort study.bmj, 370.

  5. Pinto E, Marcos G, Walters C, Goncalves F, Sacarlal J, Castro L, Rego G. (2020). Palliative care in Mozambique: Physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practices. PLoS ONE, 15(8), e0238023.

  6. Vermorgen M, Vandenbogaerde I, Van Audenhove C, Hudson P, Deliens L, Cohen J, De Vleminck A. Are family carers part of the care team providing end-of-life care? A qualitative interview study on the collaboration between family and professional carers. Palliat Med. 2021;35(1):109–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mayland, C. R., Doughty, H. C., Rogers, S. N., Gola, A., Mason, S., Hubbert, C., …Jack, B. A. (2021). A qualitative study exploring patient, family carer, and healthcare professionals’ direct experiences and barriers to providing and integrating palliative care for advanced head and neck cancer. Journal of palliative care, 36(2), 121–129.

  8. Arya A, Buchman S, Gagnon B, Downar J. Pandemic palliative care: beyond ventilators and saving lives. CMAJ. 2020;192(15):E400–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang CH, Ming Y, Chang TH, Yen YY, Lan SJ. The needs and utilization of long-term care service resources by dementia family caregivers and the affecting factors. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(16):6009.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Moosavi S, Rohani C, Borhani F, Akbari ME. Spiritual care experiences by Cancer patients, their family caregivers and Healthcare Team members in Oncology Practice settings: a qualitative study. Explore. 2021;17(5):430–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2020.08.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mohammed RS, Boateng EA, Amponsah AK, Kyei-Dompim J, Laari TT. (2023). Experiences of family caregivers of people with spinal cord injury at the neurosurgical units of the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Ghana. PLoS ONE, 18(4), e0284436.

  12. Agyemang-Duah W, Abdullah A, Mensah CM, Arthur-Holmes F, Addai B. Caring for older persons in rural and urban communities: perspectives of Ghanaian informal caregivers on their coping mechanisms. J Public Health. 2020;28:729–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kusi G, Boamah Mensah AB, Mensah B, Dzomeku K, Apiribu VM, F., Duodu PA. (2020). Caregiving motivations and experiences among family caregivers of patients living with advanced breast cancer in Ghana. PLoS ONE, 15(3), e0229683.

  14. Appiah EO, Agyeiwaa J, Amponsah A. The changing public image of nursing in Ghana. Afr J Nurs Midwifery. 2020;22(2):1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nates JL, Price KJ. Oncologic critical care. Springer International Publishing; 2019. pp. 1–2099. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74588-6.

  16. Joolaee S, Ho A, Serota K, Hubert M, Buchman DZ. Medical assistance in dying legislation: Hospice Palliative Care Providers’ perspectives. Nurs Ethics. 2021;29(1):213–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330211012049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kent EE, Mollica MA, Dionne-Odom JN, Ferrer RA, Jensen RE, Ornstein KA, Smith AW. Effect of instrumental support on distress among family caregivers: findings from a nationally representative study. Palliat Support Care. 2020;18(5):519–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tarberg AS, Kvangarsnes M, Hole T, Thronæs M, Madssen TS, Landstad BJ. Silent voices: family caregivers’ narratives of involvement in palliative care. Nurs open. 2019;6(4):1446–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Jazieh AR, Volker SE, Taher S. Involving the family in patient care: a culturally tailored communication model. Global J Qual Saf Healthc. 2018;1:33–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nkrumah J, Abekah-Nkrumah G. Facilitators and barriers of patient-centred care at the organisational level: a study of three district hospitals in the central region of Ghana. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Santangelo OE, Provenzano S, Giordano D, Alagna E, Alcamo R, Armetta F, Gliubizzi C, Grigis D, Sala N, Marrusich F, Sciuto S, Lo, Craparotta F, Peruzza M, Ferrara C, PROCLAMà A, Firenze A. Stressed caregivers. An observational study in a Rehabilitation Care Home in Western Sicily. Acta Med Mediterranea. 2019;35(4):2223–8. https://doi.org/10.19193/0393-6384_2019_4_348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sperber, N. R., Boucher, N. A., Delgado, R., Shepherd-Banigan, M. E., McKenna, K.,Moore, M., … Van Houtven, C. H. (2019). Including family caregivers in seriously ill veterans’ care: A mixed-methods study. Health Affairs, 38(6), 957–963.

  23. Stomski NJ, Morrison P. Carers’ involvement in decision daking about antipsychotic medication: a qualitative study. Health Expect. 2018;21(1):308–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Aikins A, de-G, Apt NA. Aging in Ghana: setting priorities for research, intervention and policy. Ghana Stud. 2016;19(1):35–45. https://doi.org/10.1353/ghs.2016.0002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Deegbe DA, Aziato L, Attiogbe A. Experience of epilepsy: coping strategies and health outcomes among ghanaians living with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2020;104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.106900.

  26. Kpoor A. The nuclearization of Ghanaian families. Curr Politics Econ Afr. 2015;8(3):435.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shields L. What is family-centred care? Eur J Person Centered Healthc. 2015;3(2):139–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ebadi A, Sajadi SA, Moradian ST, Akbari R. Suspended life pattern: a qualitative study on Personal Life among Family caregivers of Hemodialysis patients in Iran. Int Q Community Health Educ. 2018;38(4):225–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272684X18773763.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Coelho A, de Brito M, Teixeira P, Frade P, Barros L, Barbosa A. Family caregivers’ anticipatory grief: a conceptual framework for understanding its multiple challenges. Qual Health Res. 2020;30(5):693–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Huang ZP, Cheng HL, Loh S, Cheng K. Functional status, supportive care needs, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Advanced Lung Cancer patients aged 50 and older. Asia-Pacific J Oncol Nurs. 2020;7(2):151–60. https://doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon_50_19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Musich S, Wang SS, Kraemer S, Hawkins K, Wicker E. Caregivers for older adults : prevalence, characteristics, and Health Care utilization and expenditures. Geriatr Nurs. 2017;38(1):9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2016.06.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Alshahrani S, Magarey J, Kitson A. Relatives’ involvement in the care of patients in Acute Medical wards in two different Countries—An Ethnographic Study. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(11–12):2333–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Stanfors M, Jacobs JC, Neilson J. Caregiving time costs and Trade-offs: gender differences in Sweden, the UK, and Canada. SSM - Popul Health. 2019;9:100501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100501.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Reinhard SC. Perspectives on family’s caregiving experience in mental illness. Image: J Nurs Scholarsh. 1994;26(1):70–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Papadakos, J., Samoil, D., Umakanthan, B., Charow, R., Jones, J. M., Matthew, A.,… Giuliani, M. E. (2022). What are we doing to support informal caregivers? A scoping review of caregiver education programs in cancer care. Patient Education and Counseling, 105(7), 1722–1730.

  36. Adejoh, S. O., Boele, F., Akeju, D., Dandadzi, A., Nabirye, E., Namisango, E., … Allsop,M. J. (2021). The role, impact, and support of informal caregivers in the delivery of palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: A multi-country qualitative study. Palliative Medicine, 35(3), 552–562.

  37. Shin JY, Choi SW. Interventions to promote caregiver resilience. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2020;14(1):60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Leow MQH, Chan SWC. (2017). The Challenges, Emotions, Coping, and Gains of Family Caregivers Caring for Patients with advanced Cancer in Singapore: A Qualitative Study. Cancer Nursing, 40(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000354 Research Protocol: Assessment Tools for Palliative Care. Content last reviewed January 2021. Effective Health Care Program, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/palliative-care-tools/research-protocol.

  39. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. sage; 1994.

  40. Kyngäs H, Kääriäinen M, Elo S. (2020). The trustworthiness of content analysis. Application Content Anal Nurs Sci Res, 41–8.

  41. Crawford R, Sully K, Conroy R, Johnson C, Doward L, Bell T, Gater A. Patient-centered insights on treatment decision making and living with acute myeloid leukemia and other hematologic cancers. Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Res. 2020;13:83–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ploeg, J., Northwood, M., Duggleby, W., McAiney, C. A., Chambers, T., Peacock, S.,… Triscott, J. A. (2020). Caregivers of older adults with dementia and multiple chronic conditions: Exploring their experiences with significant changes. Dementia, 19(8), 2601–2620.

  43. Bong X, Rou, Tengah A, Zolkefli Y. Nurses’ perspectives on family involvement in Intensive Care. Int J Care Scholars. 2021;4(1):3–9. https://doi.org/10.31436/IJCS.V4I1.152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ocansey PME, Kretchy IA, Aryeetey GC, Agyabeng K, Nonvignon J. Anxiety, Depression, and stress in caregivers of children and adolescents with Mental disorders in Ghana and implications for Medication Adherence. Ghana Med J. 2021;55(3):173–82. https://doi.org/10.4314/GMJ.V55I3.1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Kyei-Arthur F, Codjoe SNA. Caring for the Elderly is very difficult: challenges and coping strategies of caregivers in Urban Poor Accra, Ghana. Clin Nurs Res. 2021;30(5):662–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773820982307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Coleman EA, Roman SP. Family caregivers’ experiences during transitions out of hospital. J Healthc Qual. 2015;37(1):12–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JHQ.0000460117.83437.b3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Abdullah A, Frederico M, Cudjoe E, Emery CR. Towards culturally specific solutions: evidence from Ghanaian kinship caregivers on child neglect intervention. Child Abuse Rev. 2020;29(5):402–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Atobrah D. Elderly Women, Community Participation and Family Care in Ghana: lessons from HIV Response and AIDS Orphan Care in Manya Krobo. Ghana Stud. 2016;19(1):73–94. https://doi.org/10.1353/ghs.2016.0004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Lu Q, Mårtensson J, Zhao Y, Johansson L. Living on the Edge: Family caregivers’ experiences of Caring for Post-stroke Family members in China: a qualitative study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019a;94:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.02.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Asuquo EF, Akpan-Idiok PA. (2020). The exceptional role of women as primary caregivers for people living with HIV/AIDS in Nigeria, West Africa. In Caregiving and home care. IntechOpen.

  51. Atanuriba GA, Apiribu F, Boamah Mensah AB, Dzomeku VM, Afaya RA, Gazari T, Kuunibe JK, Amooba PA. Caregivers’ experiences with Caring for a child living with HIV/AIDS: a qualitative study in Northern Ghana. Global Pediatr Health. 2021;8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X211003622.

  52. Nagarathnam M, Sivakumar V, Latheef S. Characteristics of Burden, coping strategies, and quality of life: the effect of age, gender, and Social Variables in Caregivers of Renal Transplanted Patients from Southern Andhra Pradesh, India. Indian J Palliat Care. 2019;25(3):407–13. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_34_19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Irfan B, Irfan O, Ansari A, Qidwai W, Nanji K. Impact of caregiving on various aspects of the lives of caregivers. Cureus. 2017;9(5):e1213. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1213.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Pope ND, Baldwin PK, Gibson A, Smith K. Becoming a caregiver: experiences of young adults moving into Family Caregiving roles. J Adult Dev. 2022;29(2):147–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-021-09391-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Ajibade Adisa T, Aiyenitaju O, Adekoya D, editors. O. (n.d.). The Work-Family Balance of British Working Women during the COVID-19 Pandemic. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-07-2020-0036.

  56. Bouldin ED, Shaull L, Andresen EM, Edwards VJ, McGuire LC. Financial and Health barriers and Caregiving-Related difficulties among Rural and Urban caregivers. J Rural Health. 2018;34(3):263–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Chang PY, Chang TH, Yu JM. Perceived stress and social support needs among primary family caregivers of ICU patients in Taiwan. Heart Lung. 2021;50(4):491–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.03.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Lynch S. (2015). The Family Caregiver Experience - Examining the Positive and Negative Aspects of Compassion Satisifaction and Compassion Fatigue using a Stress Process Model. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nurs_etds/29.

  59. Roth DL, Fredman L, Haley WE. Informal caregiving and its impact on health: a reappraisal from population-based studies. Gerontologist. 2015;55(2):309–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Cleary M, West S, Hunt GE, McLean L, Kornhaber R. A qualitative systematic review of caregivers’ experiences of Caring for Family diagnosed with Schizophrenia. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2020;41(8):667–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2019.1710012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Gallagher S, Wetherell MA. (2020). Risk of depression in family caregivers: unintended consequence of COVID-19. BJPsych open, 6(6), e119.

  62. Ullrich A, Marx G, Bergelt C, Benze G, Zhang Y, Wowretzko F, Oechsle K. Supportive care needs and service use during palliative care in family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer: a prospective longitudinal study. Support Care Cancer. 2021;29:1303–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Cook T, Roy ARK, Welker KM. Music as an emotion regulation strategy: an examination of genres of music and their roles in Rmotion regulation. Psychol Music. 2019;47(1):144–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735617734627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Kim B, Dvorak AL. Music therapy and Intimacy Behaviors of Hospice Family Caregivers in South Korea: a randomized crossover clinical trial. Nordic J Music Therapy. 2018;27(3):218–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/08098131.2018.1427783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Ter Bogt TFM, Vieno A, Doornwaard SM, Pastore M, Van Den Eijnden RJJM. You’re not alone: music as a source of consolation among adolescents and young adults. Psychol Music. 2017;45(2):155–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735616650029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Pouraboli B, Poodineh Z, Jahani Y. The effect of relaxation techniques on anxiety, fatigue and sleep quality of parents of children with leukaemia under chemotherapy in South East Iran. Asian Pac J cancer Prevention: APJCP. 2019;20(10):2903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Nyante GG, Carpenter C. The experience of carers of children with cerebral palsy living in rural areas of Ghana who have Received no Rehabilitation Services: a qualitative study. Child Care Health Dev. 2019;45(6):815–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Gómez-Zúñiga B, Pulido R, Pousada M, Armayones M. The role of parent/caregiver with children affected by rare diseases: navigating between love and fear. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(7):3724.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Lalani N, Duggleby W, Olson J. Rise above: experiences of spirituality among family caregivers caring for their dying family member in a hospice setting in Pakistan. J Hospice Palliat Nurs. 2019;21(5):422–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Park EY, Nam SJ. Time burden of caring and depression among parents of individuals with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(13):1508–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Bijnsdorp FM, Pasman HRW, Francke AL, Evans N, Peeters CF, van Broese MI. Who provides care in the last year of life? A description of care networks of community-dwelling older adults in the Netherlands. BMC Palliat care. 2019;18:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Ebimgbo SO, Chukwu NE, Okoye UO. Gender differences in family support to older adults and implications for social work in south-east Nigeria. J Aging Stud. 2021;59:100979.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Xiuxiang Z, Zhang X, Hockley J. A qualitative study of family caregivers’ coping strategies of looking after people with dementia in China. J Res Nurs. 2020;25(8):636–49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Esperandio MRG, Ladd KL. I heard the Voice. I Felt the Presence: prayer, Health and implications for clinical practice. Religions. 2015;6(2):670–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AB and PYAA conceptualized and wrote the initial draft. GD, JOS, and DAD analyzed the data. AB and EA collected the data. CAP, FA and GTN wrote the discussion. PYAA supervised the work. All authors read through the final script.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Priscilla Yeye Adumoah Attafuah.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was carried out following the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval (STC/IRB/00061/2022) was sought from the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital- Scientific and Technical Committee/ Institutional Review Board IRB. Additionally, informed consent was received from each participant. Each participant was given a consent form that outlined all the facts regarding the study clearly and concisely, along with the option for a personal explanation if necessary. Participants who agreed to participate in the study provided a signature or thumbprint on two copies of the consent form (one of the copies was kept by the authors and the other by the participant). However, for those with reading difficulties, the consent form was thoroughly explained to them in the presence of a witness before their consent was sought. Furthermore, the translator hired for the study had only access to voice recordings. Therefore, he was unaware of the participants’ identities.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Biney, A., Sarfo, J.O., Poku, C.A. et al. Challenges and coping strategies when caring for terminally ill persons with cancer: perspectives of family caregivers. BMC Palliat Care 23, 175 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01518-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01518-z

Keywords