Skip to main content
Download PDF

The effect of a single session of 30-min mindful breathing in reducing fatigue among patients with haematological cancer – a randomised controlled trial

BMC Palliative Care volume 20, Article number: 160 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Patients with haematological cancer had considerable symptom burden, in which fatigue was the most prevalent. Almost 70% of haematological cancer patients reported fatigue.

Methods

We conducted a parallel-group, non-blinded, randomised control trial at the haemato-oncology unit of University Malaya Medical Centre, from 1st October 2019 to 31st May 2020. Patients included were ≥ 18 years, had histopathological diagnosis of haematological cancer, and fatigue score of ≥4 based on the fatigue subscale of Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). Patients allocated to the intervention group received standard care plus a guided 30-min mindful breathing session, while those in control group received standard care. The study outcomes include fatigue severity according to the fatigue subscale of ESAS, visual analogue scale of 0 – 10, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale Version 4, at minute 0 and minute 30.

Results

Of 197 patients screened, 80 were eligible and they were equally randomised into 30-min mindful breathing versus standard care. Lymphoma (58.9%) was the commonest haematological malignancy, followed by multiple myeloma (13.8%), acute leukaemia (11.3%), myeloproliferative neoplasm (6.3%), chronic leukaemia (5.0%) and myelodysplastic syndrome (5.0%). There was no difference in the demographic and clinical characteristics between the 2 groups.

At minute 0, both arms of patients had similar ESAS-fatigue score (median, 5) and FACIT-fatigue score (mean ± SD, 24.7 ± 10.6 for intervention group versus 24.7 ± 9.7 for control group). At minute 30, intervention group had lower ESAS-fatigue score (median, 3 versus 5) and FACIT-fatigue score (mean ± SD, 17.1 ± 10.5 versus 24.8 ± 11.3) compared to control group. Both the ESAS-fatigue score reduction (median, − 2 versus 0, p = 0.002) and FACIT-fatigue score reduction (mean ± SD, − 6.7 versus + 0.8; p < 0.001) for the intervention group were statistically significant. The calculated effect size Cohen’s d was 1.4 for between-group comparison of differences in total FACIT-fatigue score.

Conclusions

Our results provide evidence that a single session of 30-min mindful breathing was effective in reducing fatigue in haematological cancer patients. On top of all the currently available methods, 30-min mindful breathing can prove a valuable addition.

Trial registration

NCT 05029024, date of registration 15th August 2021. (Retrospectively registered).

Peer Review reports

Background

Haematological cancers include leukaemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, myeloproliferative neoplasms and myelodysplastic syndrome [1, 2]. They accounted for 10% of all malignancies and 9.5% of malignancies-related mortality [3]. Patients with haematological cancers have considerable symptom burden, with an average of 8.8 symptoms per patient according to one cross-sectional study [4]. Among the symptoms, fatigue was the most prevalent. Almost 70% of haematological cancer patients reported fatigue.

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network defined cancer-related fatigue (CRF) as a distressing, persistent and subjective sense of physical, emotional, or cognitive tiredness or exhaustion associated with cancer or cancer-related treatment, that is disproportional to recent activity, and interferes with usual functioning [5]. Fatigue was not only the most prevalent symptom of haematological cancer [6,7,8,9,10], it was also the commonest side-effect of haematological cancer treatments such as cytotoxic chemotherapy or marrow suppressive agents [11]. Fatigue might persist for many years or remain for life in patients who had successfully achieved haematological cancer remission, post cytotoxic chemotherapy or haematopoeitic stem-cell transplantation [12,13,14,15]. CRF had significant negative impact on patients’ quality of life, daily activities, employment, social relationships and mood [16]

Management of CRF in patients with haematological cancer remained challenging despite studies reporting non-pharmacological measures, particularly exercise and psychological interventions might significantly improve CRF [17, 18]. First, exercise was contraindicated in patients with anaemia, thrombocytopenia, active infection, bone lesion and risk of falls [19]. Second, attending psychological interventions such as cognitive-behavioural therapy, psycho-educational therapy, supportive-expressive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction therapy in outpatient setting could be tiring, as well as time-consuming and expensive because these interventions are delivered in multiple sessions over months. Third, pharmacological treatments such as methylphenidate, modafinil and corticosteroid in CRF are still lacking strong evidence, and are not without side-effects [18].

Mindfulness involves paying attention on purpose, in the present moment and non-reactively [20]. It has been shown to reduce fatigue, stress, anxiety, depression and improve sleep [21,22,23,24,25]. However, most evidence on the benefits of mindfulness are based on conventional 6-8 weeks mindfulness programme. Brief mindfulness practices of 5-30 min duration warrant more research. Recent studies have shown that a single session of 20-min mindful breathing significantly reduced dyspnoea in patients with chronic lung disease and decompensated heart failure [26, 27], as well as palliating multiple symptoms in patients with terminal cancer [28]. Brief mindfulness practices require less energy and time from patients, and have the potential advantage of more sustainable habit-formation, when it is practiced regularly. But the evidence for such practices in reducing fatigue is still lacking. In this study, we aim to determine the efficacy of a single session of 30-min mindful breathing in reducing fatigue among patients with haematological cancers.

Methodology

Study design

We conducted a parallel-group, non-blinded, randomised control trial at the haemato-oncology unit of University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC), a tertiary university hospital with 1617 beds in Kuala Lumpur, capital of Malaysia, from 1st October 2019 to 31st May 2020. Patients included were aged 18 years and above, had a histopathological diagnosis of haematological cancer according to World Health Organisation classification, and a fatigue score of ≥4 based on the fatigue subscale of Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). Patients were excluded if they had impaired conscious level, cognitive impairment or any psychiatric illness that would prevent them from giving informed consent or participate fully in the study; active or past history of cancer of other system, or a haemoglobin level of < 8 g/dl [29].

Procedure

Patients with haematological cancer attending the haematology clinic or admitted to the haematology ward of UMMC were consecutively screened for eligibility. The demographic and clinical data of the eligible patients, which include age, gender, ethnicity, religion, occupation, education level, marital status, type of haematological cancer, current status of cancer, types of cancer treatment, duration of cancer, blood parameters and other co-morbidities were obtained from the hospital Electronic Medical Record System. Any missing information was obtained by face-to-face interview with patients or relatives.

Patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate in the study were randomly assigned into 2 groups based on computer-generated random numbers, in blocks of 10, with a one-to-one allocation ratio. Allocation sequence was concealed with sealed envelopes to prevent selection bias. Patients allocated to the intervention group received standard care plus a guided 30-min mindful breathing session which consisted of four breathing exercises done consecutively in one-to-one manner. The four exercises included identifying the in-and out-breath, following the entire length of the breath, bringing the mind back to the body and relaxing the whole body [30]. Each exercise lasted 7.5 min. Guidance was given by one of the two research assistants, who were medical doctors. They were trained by one of the co-investigators, who was a palliative care physician, certified in mindfulness training.

The training included a brief introduction to the basic concepts of mindfulness, followed by a 30-min mindful breathing session guided by the trainer. Guidance on delivering the intervention with attention to paralanguage (intonation, rate and rhythm of speech, pitch, articulation, use of silence, etc.) and body language (eye contact, facial expression, posture and bodily movement), followed by supervision of the actual delivery of the 30-min mindful breathing session by each research assistant were performed. The instructions for the 30-min mindful breathing are presented in Table 1. Patients in the control group received standard care alone. They were allowed to resume their usual activities 30 min prior to further assessment. Regardless of whether in intervention or control group, patients recruited in out-patient clinic were in sitting position, while patients recruited in ward were in lying position during the study.

Table 1 Instructions for 30-min mindful breathing
Full size table

The study outcomes were assessed at minute 0 (before intervention – T0) and minute 30 (after intervention – T30). The outcomes at T0 and T30 include fatigue severity according to the fatigue subscale of ESAS, a unidimensional visual analogue scale (VAS) of 0 – 10, and the score of Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale Version 4, a multidimensional fatigue scale. At the end of the study, patients in the intervention group were asked about their feedback, any harm, and asked if they were satisfied and willing to practise 30-min mindful breathing in their daily life.

The ESAS is a valid and reliable tool to assess nine common symptoms experienced by cancer patients [31]. The nine symptoms assessed include: pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, loss of appetite, wellbeing and shortness of breath. An additional blank scale is given to assess each patient’s ‘other problems’ as needed. The severity for each symptom upon assessment has a rating from 0 to 10 on a numerical scale; with 0 indicating absence of the symptom and 10 indicating the worst symptom severity. For this study, the tiredness subscale was chosen to assess participants’ fatigue severity.

The FACIT Fatigue Scale is a 13-item multidimensional assessment tool to measure individual’s fatigue level during their normal daily activities over the past 7 days [32]. It has high internal validity (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.96) and high test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.95). Each participant’s level of fatigue is rated on a five point Likert scale (0 = not at all fatigued to 4 = very much fatigued). The total FACIT-fatigue score ranges from 0 to 52, with a higher score reflecting more fatigue.

The medical ethics approval was obtained from the Medical Ethic Committee of the UMMC (Ethics no: 201971-7588). Written informed consent were obtained from all the participants. The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Statistical analysis

The sample size was calculated based on the formula for a randomised control trial for continuous variables with statistical superiority design, n = [2 SD2(Z α/2 + Zβ)2] divided by d2 [33], in which n was sample size in each group; SD was standard deviation from previous study; Z α/2 was desired level of statistical significance, typically 1.96 for type-1 error of 0.05; Zβ was desired power, typically 0.842 for 80% power; d was effect size, the difference in means. In this study, we took the SD of 1.58 and d of 1 [21]. Therefore, the minimum sample size was 78 (39 for each arms).

Results for continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), median or inter-quartile range depending on normality of the variable distributions; while results for categorical variables were expressed as percentages. Between-groups differences for continuous data was compared by using independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, as applicable; while between-group differences for categorical data was compared by using Chi-Square test or Fisher-Exact test, as applicable. A 2-sided p-value of less than 0.05 was considered as significant in this study. Bonferroni correction, 0.05/number of hypothesis was also performed to counteract the problem of multi-testing. Statistical analyses were performed using the software package, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS for windows version 25.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Of 197 patients screened, 80 were eligible and randomised into 30-min mindful breathing (intervention group, n = 40) versus standard care (control group, n = 40) (Fig. 1). The patients’ gender was almost equally distributed, with mean age of 54.6 ± 15.4 years (Table 2). Lymphoma (58.9%) was the commonest haematology malignancy, followed by multiple myeloma (13.8%), acute leukaemia (11.3%), myeloproliferative neoplasm (6.3%), chronic leukaemia (5.0%) and myelodysplastic syndrome (5.0%). There was no difference in terms of age, gender, ethnicity, marital status, religion, education level, occupation, type of haematological malignancy, disease status, comorbid or haemoglobin level between the 2 groups.

Fig. 1
figure 1

CONSORT diagram: details of enrolment, allocation and analysis

Full size image
Table 2 Demographic and clinical characteristic of patients with haematological malignancies
Full size table

At minute 0, both arms of patients had similar ESAS-fatigue score (median, 5) and FACIT-fatigue score (mean ± SD, 24.7 ± 10.6 for intervention group versus 24.7 ± 9.7 for control group) (Table 3). At minute 30, intervention group had lower ESAS-fatigue score (median, 3 versus 5) and FACIT-fatigue score (mean ± SD, 17.1 ± 10.5 versus 24.8 ± 11.3) compared to control group. Both the ESAS-fatigue score reduction (median, − 2 versus 0, p = 0.002) and FACIT-fatigue score reduction (mean ± SD, − 6.7 versus + 0.8; p < 0.001) for the intervention group were statistically significant (Table 4). The calculated effect size Cohen’s d was 1.4 for between-group comparison of differences in total FACIT-fatigue score.

Table 3 Descriptive statistic of ESAS-F and FACIT-F total score
Full size table
Table 4 Changes in ESAS-F and FACIT-F total score: comparison between 30-min mindful breathing and control arm
Full size table

Analysis of FACIT fatigue subscales showed that patients receiving 30-min mindful breathing experienced significant reduction in symptoms 1 (generalised fatigue), 3 (feeling wash-out), 5 (difficulty to initiate work), 6 (difficulty to finish work), and 12 (frustration), compared to standard care patients (all p < 0.004) (Table 5).

Table 5 FACIT-F individual item score difference: comparison between 30-min mindful breathing and control arm
Full size table

Regarding the feedback from patients in the intervention group, the majority of them found the 30-min mindful breathing useful in reducing their fatigue. The mindful breathing script was good. They felt calm and peaceful as they focused on their breathing, and were able to forget their worrying thoughts. Many slept during the session due to their extreme tiredness and felt better on waking up, which was not seen in the control group. Some patients reported that they would continue to practice themselves. A few asked for more guided sessions. Duration wise, some said it could be longer; some said it was too long. No harm was reported by any of the participants in the intervention group.

Discussion

The results showed that a single session of 30-min mindful breathing was effective in reducing fatigue rapidly in hematological cancer patients. The strength of the fatigue reduction was large with a Cohen’s d effect size of 1.4. To date, two other clinical trials have shown beneficial effects of mindfulness-based interventions on cancer-related fatigue [34, 35]. However, the intervention period of both studies was longer. The first was a 9-week mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) [34]. The second was an 8-week mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) [35].

Although conventional mindfulness practice could potentially produce a longer lasting effect on fatigue reduction, a single session of brief mindfulness practice offers an immediate bedside option to palliate fatigue in hematological cancer patients. The script of the guided 30-min mindful breathing is simple and the practice is easy to deliver. The instructors for the brief mindfulness practice need only a single session of mindfulness training. This has the potential of making the intervention easily available to cancer patients.

Other non-pharmacological interventions that improved cancer-related fatigue included home-based walking exercise program and relaxation therapy [36, 37]. As for pharmacological interventions, psychostimulants such as methylphenidate and modafinil, and dexamethasone have shown promise in reducing cancer-related fatigue [38, 39]. Thirty minutes mindful breathing could be a useful complement to the above-mentioned interventions.

Conducting the guided 30-min mindful breathing in the ward setting was not without its challenges. Approaching newly-admitted fatigued patients was difficult because most of them were unwell to undergo the session. Patients who had been admitted for some time or were near hospital discharge were more receptive for participation in the study. Other challenges were interruption from staff for checking vital signs, serving meals or medications, and cleaning. A quiet environment will be more conducive to practice. Few patients expressed difficulty concentrating for 30 min and suggested a shorter session tailored to patient’s energy. For the clinic patients, delivering the session in a private room was commendable. Quantitative feedback from patients pertaining to 30-min mindful breathing should be taken in future study.

The study has several limitations. This is a single center study. We were unable to blind the patients because their active participation was required. There was a lack of an active control. The outcome measures were subjective. We did not include any objective measurement of fatigue. We explored the immediate effect of the intervention and not the sustained effect. Multiple sessions may be necessary to produce a longer lasting effect. Many patients in the intervention arm slept during the session due to their extreme tiredness and felt better on waking up. Therefore, the significant reduction of fatigue among them could be due to the effect of the intervention itself, or the intervention may help the patients felt asleep and subsequently reduce the fatigue. There were also those who requested for audio recordings for home-practice.

Conclusion

To conclude, our results provide evidence that a single session of 30-min mindful breathing was effective in reducing fatigue in haematological cancer patients. Fatigue, disabling and the most prevalent symptom in hematological malignancies, warrants the development of better methods of management. On top of all the methods, 30-min mindful breathing can prove a valuable addition.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available with the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CRF:

Cancer-related fatigue

UMMC:

University Malaya Medical Centre

ESAS:

Edmonton Symptom Assessment System

T0:

minute 0 - before intervention

T30:

minute 30 - after intervention

VAS:

Visual analogue scale

FACIT:

Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy

n:

sample size in each group

SD:

Standard deviation

Z α/2:

Desired level of statistical significant

Zβ:

Desired power

d:

Effect size

SPSS:

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences

MBCT:

Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy

MBSR:

Mindfulness-based stress reduction

ALL:

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia

AML:

Acute myeloid leukemia

CLL:

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia

CML:

Chronic myeloid leukemia

Hb:

Haemoglobin

ESAS-F:

Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Fatigue component

FACIT-F:

Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue component

IQR:

Interquartile Range

References

  1. Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Diebold J, Flandrin G, Muller-Hermelink HK, Vardiman J, et al. The World Health Organization classification of hematological malignancies report of the clinical advisory committee meeting, Airlie house, Virginia, November 1997. Mod Pathol. 2000;13(2):193–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, Thiele J, Borowitz MJ, Le Beau MM, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127(20):2391.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(1):7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Manitta V, Zordan R, Cole-Sinclair M, Nandurkar H, Philip J. The symptom burden of patients with hematological malignancy: a cross-sectional observational study. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2011;42(3):432–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Berger AM, Mooney K, Alvarez-Perez A, Breitbart WS, Carpenter KM, Cella D, et al. Cancer-related fatigue, version 2.2015. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2015;13(8):1012–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Courneya KS, Sellar CM, Stevinson C, McNeely ML, Peddle CJ, Friedenreich CM, et al. Randomized controlled trial of the effects of aerobic exercise on physical functioning and quality of life in lymphoma patients. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(27):4605–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Else M, Smith AG, Cocks K, Richards SM, Crofts S, Wade R, et al. Patients' experience of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: baseline health-related quality of life results from the LRF CLL4 trial. Br J Haematol. 2008;143(5):690–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gulbrandsen N, Hjermstad MJ, Wisloff F. Interpretation of quality of life scores in multiple myeloma by comparison with a reference population and assessment of the clinical importance of score differences. Eur J Haematol. 2004;72(3):172–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnsen AT, Tholstrup D, Petersen MA, Pedersen L, Groenvold M. Health related quality of life in a nationally representative sample of haematological patients. Eur J Haematol. 2009;83(2):139–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Persson L, Larsson G, Ohlsson O, Hallberg IR. Acute leukaemia or highly malignant lymphoma patients' quality of life over two years: a pilot study. Eur J Cancer Care. 2001;10(1):36–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zittoun R, Achard S, Ruszniewski M. Assessment of quality of life during intensive chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation. Psychooncology. 1999;8(1):64–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Heinonen H, Volin L, Uutela A, Zevon M, Barrick C, Ruutu T. Quality of life and factors related to perceived satisfaction with quality of life after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Ann Hematol. 2001;80(3):137–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruffer JU, Flechtner H, Tralls P, Josting A, Sieber M, Lathan B, et al. Fatigue in long-term survivors of Hodgkin's lymphoma; a report from the German Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group (GHSG). Eur J Cancer. 2003;39(15):2179–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sherman AC, Coleman EA, Griffith K, Simonton S, Hine RJ, Cromer J, et al. Use of a supportive care team for screening and preemptive intervention among multiple myeloma patients receiving stem cell transplantation. Support Care Cancer. 2003;11(9):568–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wettergren L, Bjorkholm M, Axdorph U, Bowling A, Langius-Eklof A. Individual quality of life in long-term survivors of Hodgkin's lymphoma--a comparative study. Qual Life Res. 2003;12(5):545–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Curt GA, Breitbart W, Cella D, Groopman JE, Horning SJ, Itri LM, et al. Impact of cancer-related fatigue on the lives of patients: new findings from the fatigue coalition. Oncologist. 2000;5(5):353–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hilfiker R, Meichtry A, Eicher M, Nilsson Balfe L, Knols RH, Verra ML, et al. Exercise and other non-pharmaceutical interventions for cancer-related fatigue in patients during or after cancer treatment: a systematic review incorporating an indirect-comparisons meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(10):651–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mustian KM, Alfano CM, Heckler C, Kleckner AS, Kleckner IR, Leach CR, et al. Comparison of pharmaceutical, psychological, and exercise treatments for Cancer-related fatigue: a Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(7):961–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Baumann FT, Kraut L, Schüle K, Bloch W, Fauser AA. A controlled randomized study examining the effects of exercise therapy on patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009;45:355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jacobson E, Dreaver J, Miller R, Martin D. *wherever you go there you are: mindfulness meditation in everyday life – Jon Kabat-Zinn *how yoga works: an introduction to somatic yoga – Elenor Criswell *Vanda Scaravelli on yoga – Esther Meyers *grace unfolding: psychotherapy in the Spirit of the Tao-Te Ching – Greg Johanson & Ron Kurtz *interview with Ron Kurtz – Donna Martin *30 scripts for relaxation, imagery and inner healing volumes I & 2 – Julie T. Lusk Int J Yoga Ther. 1995;6(1):46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Johns SA, Brown LF, Beck-Coon K, Monahan PO, Tong Y, Kroenke K. Randomized controlled pilot study of mindfulness-based stress reduction for persistently fatigued cancer survivors. Psycho-oncology. 2015;24(8):885–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Carlson LE, Garland SN. Impact of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) on sleep, mood, stress and fatigue symptoms in cancer outpatients. Int J Behav Med. 2005;12(4):278–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ando M, Morita T, Akechi T, Ito S, Tanaka M, Ifuku Y, et al. The efficacy of mindfulness-based meditation therapy on anxiety, depression, and spirituality in Japanese patients with cancer. J Palliat Med. 2009;12(12):1091–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yook K, Lee SH, Ryu M, Kim KH, Choi TK, Suh SY, et al. Usefulness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for treating insomnia in patients with anxiety disorders: a pilot study. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008;196(6):501–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shennan C, Payne S, Fenlon D. What is the evidence for the use of mindfulness-based interventions in cancer care? A review. Psycho-oncology. 2011;20(7):681–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tan S-B, Liam C-K, Pang Y-K, Leh-Ching Ng D, Wong T-S, Wei-Shen Khoo K, et al. The Effect of 20-Minute Mindful Breathing on the Rapid Reduction of Dyspnea at Rest in Patients With Lung Diseases: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2019;57(4):802-8.

  27. Ng DL-C, Chai C-S, Tan K-L, Chee K-H, Tung Y-Z, Wai S-Y, et al. The Efficacy of a Single Session of 20-Minute Mindful Breathing in Reducing Dyspnea Among Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: A Randomized Controlled Trial. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®. 2021;38(3):246-52.

  28. Look ML, Tan SB, Hong LL, Ng CG, Yee HA, Lim LY, et al. Symptom reduction in palliative care from single session mindful breathing: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. 2020:bmjspcare-2020-002382.

  29. Prochaska MT, Newcomb R, Block G, Park B, Meltzer DO. Association between Anemia and fatigue in hospitalized patients: does the measure of Anemia matter? J Hosp Med. 2017;12(11):898–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tung YZ, Tan SB. Mindful breathing for suffering. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. 2020:bmjspcare-2020-002373.

  31. Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K. The Edmonton symptom assessment system (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care. 1991;7(2):6–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Yellen SB, Cella DF, Webster K, Blendowski C, Kaplan E. Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the functional assessment of Cancer therapy (FACT) measurement system. J Pain Symptom Manag. 1997;13(2):63–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian J Psychol Med. 2013;35(2):121–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. van der Lee ML, Garssen B. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy reduces chronic cancer-related fatigue: a treatment study. Psycho-oncology. 2012;21(3):264–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hoffman CJ, Ersser SJ, Hopkinson JB, Nicholls PG, Harrington JE, Thomas PW. Effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction in mood, breast- and endocrine-related quality of life, and well-being in stage 0 to III breast cancer: a randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(12):1335–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mock V, Pickett M, Ropka ME, Lin EM, Stewart KJ, Rhodes VA, et al. Fatigue and quality of life outcomes of exercise during Cancer treatment. Cancer Pract. 2001;9(3):119–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Decker TW, Cline-Elsen J, Gallagher M. Relaxation therapy as an adjunct in radiation oncology. J Clin Psychol. 1992;48(3):388–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Minton O, Richardson A, Sharpe M, Hotopf M, Stone PC. Psychostimulants for the management of cancer-related fatigue: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2011;41(4):761–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Yennurajalingam S, Frisbee-Hume S, Palmer JL, Delgado-Guay MO, Bull J, Phan AT, et al. Reduction of cancer-related fatigue with dexamethasone: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(25):3076–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to all the patients who had participated in the study.

We also thank Prof Dr. Puthiaparamil T. Thomas for language editing and proofreading.

Funding

This study was fully supported by the UNIMAS Cross Discipline Research Grant with the grant number F05/CDRG/1844/2019. Open Access funding provided by Universiti Malaysia Sarawak.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia

    Diana-Leh-Ching Ng & Chee-Shee Chai

  2. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Gin-Gin Gan, Nur Adila Anuar, Yu-Zhen Tung, Natalie-Zi Lai, Yi-Wen Tan & Seng-Beng Tan

  3. Faculty of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, University Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia

    Siti Norazilah Mohd Said & Amalia Madihie

Authors
  1. Diana-Leh-Ching Ng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gin-Gin Gan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nur Adila Anuar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yu-Zhen Tung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Natalie-Zi Lai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yi-Wen Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Siti Norazilah Mohd Said
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Amalia Madihie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Chee-Shee Chai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Seng-Beng Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DLCN, GGG, NABA, YZT, NZL, YWT, SNBMS, ABM, CSC, and SBT had contributed substantially to this study, which includes: Substantial contributions to conception and design, data acquisition, or data analysis and interpretation; Drafting the article or critically revising it for important intellectual content; Final approval of the version to be published; and Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy and integrity of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seng-Beng Tan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Medical Ethic Committee of the UMMC with Ethics no: 201971-7588. The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all the study patients.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest in respect to the research, authorship, and publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ng, DLC., Gan, GG., Anuar, N.A. et al. The effect of a single session of 30-min mindful breathing in reducing fatigue among patients with haematological cancer – a randomised controlled trial. BMC Palliat Care 20, 160 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00855-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00855-7

Keywords

BMC Palliative Care

ISSN: 1472-684X

Contact us