Skip to main content
Download PDF

Effect of an educational intervention on nurses’ competence in activities of daily living support in end-of-life care using a pretest–posttest repeated measures design

BMC Palliative Care volume 22, Article number: 119 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Most patients in specialized palliative care units need nursing support to perform activities of daily living (ADL), such as using a toilet or transferring out of a bed or chair. To deliver high-quality ADL support that facilitates patients’ movement and protects nurses’ musculoskeletal health, nurses need appropriate knowledge and skills. The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of education based on the “Advanced Kinaesthetics in Palliative care (AdKinPal) program” on the competence in Kinaesthetics, self-efficacy regarding ADL support in end-of-life care and musculoskeletal complaints of nurses from specialist palliative care units.

Methods

A pretest–posttest repeated measures design was applied. The study took place in three specialised units for palliative care in Switzerland between June 2018 and April 2020. All the nurses who worked in participating wards (n = 62) and fulfilled the inclusion criteria were asked to participate. The intervention – the AdKinPal program – is an education-based training program conducted for six months. We took measurements using self-administered questionnaires at three points before and after the intervention. Using descriptive statistics, repeated measurement analysis of variance (ANOVA) and independent-samples t-tests, we analysed the participants’ demographic characteristics as well as developments over time and relationships between the three outcome variables: Kinaesthetics competence, self-efficacy regarding ADL support in end-of-life care and musculoskeletal complaints.

Results

Fifty-nine nurses and one physiotherapist participated, and 38 participants (63%) responded to all three questionnaires. The AdKinPal training improved the nurses’ perceived Kinaesthetics competence and self-efficacy regarding ADL support in end-of-life care. Participants who reported lower back, neck or shoulder pain had a significantly lower Kinaesthetics competence.

Conclusions

The AdKinPal program can raise nurses’ Kinaesthetics competence. Thereby, patients’ autonomy and quality of life could be supported, and symptom management could be enhanced in a holistic manner. Furthermore, the AdKinPal program fosters nurses’ self-efficacy in ADL support in end-of-life care. A strong sense of self-efficacy enhances professional well-being in many ways. Additionally, the nursing staff’s musculoskeletal health can be promoted by enhancing their Kinaesthetics competence.

Trial registration

DRKS00015908. Registration Date 23.11.2018.

Peer Review reports

Background

In high-income countries, a majority of people (73%) die in an institution, such as a hospital or nursing home [1]. Health care professionals in specialised palliative care units are frequently confronted with caring for people at the end of their life. End-of-life care is defined in this study based on the narrow definition of end-of-life [2] as a period where the person is unable to care for themselves and the disease may be rapidly progressing (Karnofsky Performance Status Index ≤ 50) [3].

Patients at the end of life with specialised palliative care needs experience a heavy symptom burden. A systematic review identified symptom prevalence among adults with advanced cancer and non-cancer disease, such as end-stage renal disease, heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or Parkinson’s disease. Symptom prevalence ranges from 13 to 100% for fatigue, 11 to 98% for pain, 11 to 98% for breathlessness, 2 to 78% for nausea, 2 to 70% for confusion and 4 to 65% for constipation [4]. In addition, a significant number of patients have physical limitations because of illness progression, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, and other complex treatments. For persons diagnosed with a terminal illness, autonomy and maintenance of independence are highly important [5, 6].

Most of these patients require nursing support to perform basic self-care activities – known as activities of daily living (ADL) – such as bathing, dressing, using a toilet or transferring out of a bed or chair. Self-care activities can be affected by symptoms such as pain, fatigue or breathlessness. The kind of support provided by nurses while supporting ADL can help relieve pain [7, 8]. To manage symptoms such as fatigue and dyspnoea, energy conservation and simplification techniques are central while supporting patients with their daily activities. This includes pacing activities, taking frequent rests and avoiding strenuous motions. A balance must be found between increasing rest to alleviate asthenia and supporting independence and autonomy [7, 9]. Additionally, appropriate movement and positioning support can convey orientation and safety and prevent pressure ulcers [7, 10].

To deliver high-quality ADL support, nurses need appropriate knowledge and skills [11]. However, nurses have uncertainties regarding how to provide high-quality ADL support for persons with specialised palliative care needs, especially regarding moving or positioning the person such that they do not experience much pain and dyspnoea [8, 12].

Nurses offering specialised palliative care are particularly at risk of experiencing stress [13, 14]. However, strengthening nurses’ competence and confidence improves their self-efficacy [15]. Subsequently, higher self-efficacy buffers the impact of perceived stressful encounters on their professional quality of life [16]. Finally, nurses frequently suffer from work-related pain and musculoskeletal disorders while providing physical care, such as moving a patient in and out of bed. Prevalence figures reported pain in the last 3–6 months as follows: 44% had lower back pain, 44% had shoulder pain, 48% had neck pain, 21% had upper extremity pain and 38% had lower extremity pain [17]. Therefore, nurses need to gain competence in moving and transferring patients to prevent endangering their own health [18].

The need for nurses’ competence development to improve their ADL support skills has been acknowledged [19, 20]. Different training approaches exist, such as Natural Mobility [21], PERSAMO (PERson-centred and SAfe MObility care) [22] or the Bobath concept for neurologically impaired patients [23]. The first two approaches have not yet been adequately researched, while the Bobath concept is a disease-specific concept. However, Kinaesthetics is a training concept that enhances nurses’ competence in daily activity support and is effective in improving patients’ functionality and quality of life [11, 24] as well as nurses’ musculoskeletal health [11]. Kinaesthetics training aims to increase the quality of interaction and movement of the patient and the nurse in everyday activities. Nurses are enabled to adapt the direct interactions via touch and movement in everyday support to the situation mindfully and individually. Thereby, patients’ self-determination, independence and self-care are supported, and nurses’ musculoskeletal health is enhanced [11, 25]. In German-speaking countries (Germany, Austria, and Switzerland), Kinaesthetics training is integrated in vocational nursing education. However, in practice, nurses’ competence in ADL support based on Kinaesthetics varies significantly, and competence development is not supported systematically [26, 27]. A systematic approach is needed to gain favourable patient and nursing outcomes [24, 28, 29].

Aim and research questions

To address the demands of competence development in end-of-life care mentioned above, our research team developed an education-based intervention for nurses working in specialised palliative care settings, the Advanced Kinaesthetics in Palliative care (AdKinPal) program (see Intervention). The development of this intervention was based on the curricula of Kinaesthetics [30, 31], previous studies [11, 12] and a workshop and interviews with 14 experts (nurses with Kinaesthetics trainer certificate and palliative care experience).

The objective of the study is to explore and investigate the impact of education based on the AdKinPal program on the competence in Kinaesthetics, self-efficacy regarding ADL support in end-of-life care and musculoskeletal complaints of nurses from specialist palliative care units. In addition, patient data on symptom prevalence was collected (publication in progress) and a process evaluation was conducted [32]. In this article, we focus on the following research questions:

  • Does the AdKinPal program improve nurses’ competence in Kinaesthetics and self-efficacy regarding ADL support in end-of-life care?

  • Does the AdKinPal program reduce nurses’ musculoskeletal complaints?

Methods

A phase II exploratory study [33] using a pretest–posttest repeated-measures design, including a process evaluation [34], was applied. The measurement time points are before (T0) and after the education-based intervention (T1) and six months after the intervention was finished (T2) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Timeline of the data collection in the AdKinPal study; process and outcome evaluation of patients’ data are not part of this article

KCSE: Kinaesthetics Competence Self-Evaluation, ESAS: Edmonton Symptom Assessment System.

Full size image

Setting and participants

The study took place in three specialised units for palliative care in three community hospitals in the German-speaking part of Switzerland. All the nurses who worked in participating wards and fulfilled the inclusion criteria were asked to participate. The inclusion criteria were as follows:

  • Registered nurses (diploma or bachelor’s degree), licenced practical nurses, nursing aids working in direct care.

  • Aged 18 years or above.

  • Informed consent.

Furthermore, the participation in the study was open to physiotherapists who regularly worked in the palliative care units, and who also had the task of helping patients with support in activities of daily living.

The sample size was calculated for repeated measurement comparison of the primary outcome (competence in Kinaesthetics) [26]. With an assumed effect size of 1 (on the 4–16 points Kinaesthetics Competence Self-Evaluation [KCSE] scale) and a conservatively estimated standard deviation of 2.5, a total sample size of 49 nurses was required (level of significance α = 0.05 and power 80%). To account for dropouts and missing values (20%) or repeated measurement data, the starting sample required around 60 nurses.

Intervention

The intervention was an education-based training program conducted for six months. Some of the key features of the multi-faceted program were workshops, workbooks and small note cards and inputs during daily care (Table 1). Every month, a “theme of the month”, for example, mindfulness movement, was introduced during a workshop. A workbook was handed out to all the nurses. Participants were also given small note cards, which could be carried in their work clothes, to remember and integrate the theme of the month in their daily work. Furthermore, nurses were offered individual coaching during daily care situations to support the implementation of the training content.

Nurses with a level 3 Kinaesthetics trainer certificate conducted the workshops and individual coaching. Level 3 Kinaesthetics trainers have a minimum of 1366 h of training and four years of experience with Kinaesthetics [35]. The intervention facilitators also had several years of experience in palliative care.

Table 1 AdKinPal program for palliative care nurses
Full size table

Recruitment and data collection

The investigator informed the nurses about the study and informed consent was obtained. Data were collected from the participating nurses with paper and pencil questionnaires distributed by a member of the research team. The completed questionnaires were returned to the head nurse in an enclosed envelope and then sent to the research team.

Variables and measurement

The data were collected using three instruments: the KCSE scale (28 items) [36], nurses’ self-efficacy in ADL support in end-of-life care scale (14 items) and the Nordic questionnaire for analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms (9 items) [37]. The nurses’ sociodemographic data were collected with ten items concerning age, gender, employment status, nursing education, experience in palliative care and training in palliative care and Kinaesthetics. The KCSE scale is based on a concept development study aiming to describe nurses’ competence in Kinaesthetics [11] and contains four subscales: knowledge of Kinaesthetics, self-perceived skills of Kinaesthetics, attitude and dynamic state (Table 2).

Table 2 Content of the KCSE scale [36]
Full size table

The items have four response options for agreement (disagree, somewhat agree, agree, strongly agree), frequency (never, sometimes, almost every time, every time) and quality (not at all, somewhat, good, very good). The KCSE scale has a good content validity index (0.93) and internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.91) [36].

The nurses’ self-efficacy in ADL support in end-of-life care scale was developed by the research team based on Banduras’ guide for constructing self-efficacy scales [38]. The scale contains 14 items, where nurses rate their self-efficacy in ADL support in end-of-life care on a scale from 0 (not capable) to 10 (exceptionally capable). Here are two examples of the items: “I am able to support a patient with pain to find a pain-reducing position” and “I am able to support a patient with breathlessness during daily care activities”. The scale was tested on face and content validity by six experts.

The Nordic questionnaire for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms covers nine symptom sites (neck, shoulders, elbows, wrist/hands, upper back, lower back, hips/thighs, knees and ankles/feet). The respondents were asked if they experienced any musculoskeletal trouble that prevented normal activity (the answer categories were yes and no). The Nordic questionnaire for analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms has good test–retest reliability, and its validity among different occupational groups [37] and nurses [39] has been established. We used the German version [40] with a recall period of 3 months. Data collection took place between June 2018 and April 2020.

Data management and analysis

The study data were recorded with paper Case Report Forms (CRF). CRF did not contain any person identifying information, but appropriate coded identification was used. Data were checked for coding errors and entered into IBM SPSS Statistics, version 25. For 10% of the data, a double data entry was performed to check the accuracy of the data entry [41]. The verification of the double-entered data records showed only slight deviations (less than 0.5%), indicating high data integrity. The CRF and electronic data were stored according to the law [42].

The data were analysed as follows: In the KCSE scale, single items scored between 1 and 4, with higher scores indicating higher self-evaluated competence in Kinaesthetics. For the KCSE subscales of knowledge, skills, attitude and dynamic state, mean scores were calculated (range 1–4). The total score was calculated by adding the mean scores of the subscales (range 4–16) [36].

For the nurses’ self-efficacy in ADL support in palliative care, assessed by the ADL support in Palliative Care Self-Efficacy Scale (ADL-PC-SES), the mean score of all the items was calculated, which ranges from 0 to 10.

Data regarding musculoskeletal complaints, assessed by the Nordic questionnaire for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms, were analysed separately for each body region. The total score of all the complaints (sum of the complaints) for each participant at each time point was calculated.

The sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants were evaluated by descriptive statistics according to the underlying data scales (frequencies for qualitative data, range, mean values and standard deviations for metric data).

The nurses’ competence in Kinaesthetics, measured by the total score and subscores, and the nursing staff’s self-efficacy were characterized by descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and analysed using a repeated measurement ANOVA, accounting for the longitudinal nature of the data. Similarly, the nurses’ musculoskeletal complaints were characterized by frequency and analysed using a repeated measurement ANOVA. To better handle missing values, we used the SPSS procedure MIXED. The assumption of sphericity was tested using Mauchly’s test and, in case of violation, the correction by Greenhouse-Geisser was taken into consideration. The relationship between the nurses’ competence in Kinaesthetics (total score) and nursing staff’s self-efficacy was tested using linear regression. Furthermore, the nursing staff was grouped by the prevalence of certain symptoms (neck pain, shoulder pain, lower back pain) and tested for differences in their Kinaesthetics competence (total score and subscores) using independent-samples t-tests. Additionally, relevant assumptions were tested for their fulfilment. All the tests were performed at a level of significance of 0.05. The statistical analysis was provided by a statistician using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 25.

Ethical considerations

The study was carried out following the protocol and principles enunciated in the current version of the Declaration of Helsinki, the guidelines of Good Clinical Practice, and Swiss Law and the Swiss regulatory authority’s requirements. The ethics commission Ostschweiz has approved the study protocol (EKOS 2017 − 00721).

Results

Of the eligible nursing staff (n = 62), 59 nurses (95%) and one physiotherapist signed the informed consent, and 38 participants (63%) responded to all three questionnaires (Fig. 2). The participants’ mean age was 40.83 years. Their mean experience in palliative care was 6.79 years. Most of the participants were registered nurses (74%), followed by licensed practical nurses (12%) and nurse assistants (12%). They have worked for an average of 5.12 years in the current institution. 32% had passed an advanced Kinaesthetics training course and 43% a basic one, and 20% had received no standard Kinaesthetics training (Table 3).

Table 3 The sociodemographic, employment and competence characteristics of the study participants (n = 60)
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Flow diagram of the study participants

Full size image

Nurses’ Kinaesthetics competence

The mean total score of the nurses’ Kinaesthetic competence was 11.27 at T0, 11.99 at T1 and 11.86 at T2. The nursing staff’s level of Kinaesthetic competence (KCSE total score) significantly increased over time, with F = 14.70 (2, 50) p = 0.000. Except for the subscore attitude, a significant increase was observed in the subscores of dynamic state (F = 6.42 (2, 46) p = 0.003), knowledge (F = 19.19 (2, 51) p = 0.000) and skills (F = 10.37 (2, 47), p = 0.000) between the preintervention and postintervention phase (Table 4).

Table 4 Development of nursing staff’s Kinaesthetics competence before intervention (T0), after intervention (T1) and at follow-up (T2) (n = 60)
Full size table

Nurses’ self-efficacy in ADL support in palliative care

The mean total score of nurses’ self-efficacy in ADL support was 7.22 at T0, 7.61 at T1 and 7.67 at T2. The nursing staff’s level of self-efficacy in ADL support in palliative care (ADL-PC-SES total score) significantly increased over time, with F = 5.46 (2, 51) p = 0.007 (Table 5).

Table 5 Development of the nursing staff’s self-efficacy in ADL support before intervention (T0), after intervention (T1) and at follow-up (T2) (n = 59)
Full size table

Linear regressions were calculated to investigate the interrelationship between the nursing staff’s self-efficacy in ADL support and their Kinaesthetic Competence (KCSE total score) at the three time points (T0, T1, T2). Significant relationships could be found for all three points in time: T0 (F (1, 57) = 13.47, β = 0.36, p = 0.001, 95% CI [0.16, 0.55]), with an R2 of 0.19; T1 (F (1, 49) = 13.72, β = 0.36, p = 0.001, 95% CI [0.16, 0.55]), with an R2 of 0.2; T2 (F (1, 39) = 6.99, β = 0.27, p = 0.012, 95% CI [0.06, 0.48]), with an R2 of 0.15.

Nurses’ musculoskeletal complaints

The mean total score of musculoskeletal complaints was 2.22 at T0, 1.76 at T1 and 1.54 at T2. The incidence of nursing staff’s musculoskeletal complaints over the three measurement time points is displayed in Fig. 3. No significant reduction was observed in the musculoskeletal complaints over time and the sum of musculoskeletal complaints.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Incidence of the nursing staff’s musculoskeletal complaints before intervention (T0), after intervention (T1) and at follow-up (T2) (on the data available during all three time points, n = 36–38)

Full size image

Even though we couldn’t find a significant reduction in musculoskeletal complaints over time, an obvious relationship exists between nurses’ Kinaesthetics competences and musculoskeletal complaints for body parts where pain was most frequently reported (lower back, neck and shoulder). Participants who reported pain had a significantly lower KCSE total score (lower Kinaesthetics competence): pain in the lower back (t (148) = 2.49, p = 0.014), neck (t (147) = 2.98, p = 0.003) and shoulder (t (145) = 2.04, p = 0.043). See Table 6 for the complete results, including the subscores. For all three body parts, the subscore “skills” is significantly higher in the group that did not report pain, whereas we did not find any differences in the subscore “attitude”.

Table 6 T-test results comparing Kinaesthetics competence (KCSE total and subscores) and pain in the lower back, neck and shoulder
Full size table

Discussion

This study was the first to evaluate the outcome of the AdKinPal program on palliative care nurses’ competence in Kinaesthetics, self-efficacy regarding ADL support in end-of-life care and musculoskeletal complaints. The results demonstrate that the AdKinPal training improves both nurses’ perceived Kinaesthetics competence and self-efficacy regarding ADL support in end-of-life care.

A higher Kinaesthetic competence score means that the participants better understand human movement support, have further developed their skills to be attentive during interaction via touch and movement and adapt the support to the individual situation. They better understand how to support a care-dependent person in a way that facilitates their own movement, and they adjust the physical environment to enhance the independent movement of the care-dependent person. In addition, they better understand the links between movement support and symptom management: for example, how to support movement or position to reduce pain or breathlessness. These are central elements for providing good “physical care” or “fundamental care”, as it is called in other studies [43, 44].

To our knowledge, no other studies exist on the development of Kinaesthetics competence in palliative or end-of-life care. Findings from a study on the long-term care setting show higher Kinaesthetic competence levels in the sample of nursing home staff [26]. However, this sample also had a higher level of standard Kinaesthetics training (9% no training, 38% basic training, 37% advanced training, 13% peer tutoring training and 3% trainer education) compared to this study’s sample (20% no training, 43% basic training, 32% advanced training, 3% peer tutoring training and 2% trainer education). Higher Kinaesthetics competence is associated with having passed standard Kinaesthetics training courses and having completed additional Kinaesthetics training in the last twelve months [26]. Nevertheless, the AdKinPal programme was able to significantly increase the Kinaesthetics competence of the palliative care nurses. Additionally, the process evaluation showed that the nurses were highly satisfied with the programme, they gained a variety of insights and they changed their behaviour; for example, they could now support a patient to sit up at an appropriate speed so that the person could actively participate [32].

Furthermore, our findings show that higher Kinaesthetic competence is correlated with higher self-efficacy regarding ADL support.

The participants’ self-efficacy regarding ADL support in end-of-life care was high before the intervention started, which is not surprising since the participants had an average of 6.8 years of experience in palliative care and 65% had completed further training in this field. Nevertheless, their self-efficacy increased significantly over time. The results show that nurses felt more confident in supporting patients with respiratory distress or pain in ADL or in advising and guiding relatives on ADL support. This is an important aspect, especially when patients are discharged and relatives need guidance on how to provide good basic care [45].

An important result is the correlation between higher Kinaesthetic competence and fewer musculoskeletal complaints. It indicates how to address the pressing problem of musculoskeletal complaints among nurses. Also, our study had a high number of nurses with musculoskeletal complaints, especially in the lower back, neck and shoulders. The nursing profession is one of the riskiest occupations for lower back pain. The primary cause for work-related musculoskeletal disorders in nursing is patient-handling tasks such as lifting, transferring, and repositioning of patients [46]. Thus, the AdKinPal Program also focused on enhancing nurses’ competence in increasing their own body awareness, that is, in recognising their own body’s tensions when they start to lift a patient and react accordingly, such as by rolling the patient instead of lifting them or adapting one’s own movement.

Although the AdKinPal program has been developed for nurses, it may be suitable for other healthcare professionals, specifically for physiotherapists and occupational therapists, who support palliative care patients with activities of daily living.

Strengths and limitations of this research

The AdKinPal program addresses both individual and organisational aspects, affecting all nurses and, consequently, patients within the uptake area. Therefore, a control in the same unit is not feasible [47]. By applying this study design, we aimed to get more knowledge about the effects and feasibility of this intervention for a subsequent cluster randomised trial. The process evaluation also gave us indications on how to improve the program [32]. In the course of the study, we had a dropout of 37% (22 from 60 study participants). During the follow-up period, one participating ward experienced organisational changes due to the onset of the corona pandemic, which led to nurses leaving the ward. This probably had no impact on the study’s results since the dropouts had characteristics similar to those who remain in the study. However, a high nursing turnover could influence the sustainability of the intervention [32]. To evaluate their Kinaesthetics competence, we used a self-assessment approach. The validity/reliability of self-assessed measures is debated, although it has been reported as the most common form of competence assessment [48]. However, in future studies, we recommend also using an external assessment of nurses’ competence in Kinaesthetics to reinforce or dispel the nursing staff’s perceptions [49].

Implications for practice and research

The complexity of care at the end-of-life is well recognized. The integration of non-pharmacological and pharmacological management is required [50]. Patients and their families consider good physical care, symptom management and integrated care to be the most important elements of end-of-life care within the hospital setting. Further, the quality of physical care is reflected in how independence is supported, such as when the care-dependent person is enabled to be in a position that allows independent eating [51]. To provide good physical care and symptom management, nurses’ competence in supporting patients in daily activities is crucial. In contrast, incompetent ADL support may result in severe negative consequences to both care-dependent persons [18] and nurses through pain and bruises and back injuries and musculoskeletal strain, respectively [52]. Therefore, it is important to ensure competence development of the nursing staff in ADL support. This study contributes new knowledge on the subject of good physical care for patients with end-of-life care demands.

More research should be conducted to explore competence development, its influencing factors and the connection between the nursing staff’s Kinaesthetics competence and patients’ outcomes, such as autonomy and self-efficacy in daily activities, and subsequently, their quality of life.

Conclusions

The AdKinPal program could increase nurses’ Kinaesthetics competence. Thereby, patients’ autonomy and quality of life could be supported, and symptom management could be enhanced in a holistic manner. Furthermore, the AdKinPal program fosters nurses’ self-efficacy in ADL support in end-of-life care. A strong sense of self-efficacy enhances professional well-being in many ways. Additionally, nurses’ musculoskeletal health can be promoted by enhancing the nursing staffs’ Kinaesthetics competence.

The AdKinPal programme has the potential to be transferred to other areas where end-of-life care is delivered, such as in nursing homes or home care.

Data Availability

The study data are securely stored under lock and key at Estern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, St. Gallen, Switzerland. We do not have permission from the Ethical Committee to release or share the data; thus, we cannot make it available in the public domain. However, the datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ADL:

Activities of Daily Living

ADL-PC-SES:

Activities of Daily Living Palliative Care Self-Efficacy Scale

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

CRF:

Case Report Forms

ESAS:

Edmonton Symptom Assessment System

KCSE:

Kinaesthetics Competence Self-Evaluation

References

  1. Adair T. Who dies where? Estimating the percentage of deaths that occur at home. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6:e006766. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006766

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Radbruch L, Payne S. White Paper on Standards and norms for Hospice and Palliative Care in Europe: part 1 recommendations of the European Association for Palliative Care. Palliativmedizin. 2011;12:216–27. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1276909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mor V, Laliberte L, Morris JN, Wiemann M. The Karnofsky performance status scale: an examination of its reliability and validity in a research setting. Cancer. 1984;53:2002–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19840501)53:9<2002::AID-CNCR2820530933>3.0.CO;2-W

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moens K, Higginson IJ, Harding R. Are there differences in the prevalence of palliative care-related problems in people living with advanced cancer and eight non-cancer conditions? A systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014;48:660–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.11.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Harstäde CW, Blomberg K, Benzein E, Östlund U. Dignity-conserving care actions in palliative care: an integrative review of swedish research. Scand J Caring Sci. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kennedy G. The importance of patient dignity in Care at the end of life. Ulster Med J. 2016;85:45–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Enke A, Luckei B. Kinaesthetics in Palliative Care - Werkzeuge für mehr Lebensqualität und Autonomie: Erfahrungsberichte aus der gelebten Begleitung schwerstkranker Menschen. Bonn: PalliaMed-Verlag; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hanson LC, Eckert JK, Dobbs D, Williams CS, Caprio AJ, Sloane PD, Zimmerman S. Symptom experience of dying long-term care residents. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56:91–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01388.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Santiago-Palma J, Payne R. Palliative care and rehabilitation. Cancer. 2001;92:1049–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20010815)92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brink P, Smith TF, Linkewich B. Factors associated with pressure ulcers in palliative home care. J Palliat Med. 2006;9:1369–75. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2006.9.1369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gattinger H, Leino-Kilpi H, Köpke S, Marty-Tauber S, Senn B, Hantikainen V. Nurses’ competence in kinaesthetics: a concept development. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-016-1126-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maurer C, Hantikainen V, Gattinger H. Anwendung und Chancen von Kinästhetik in der Palliative Care: eine qualitative Studie. Palliat ch. 2017:40–4.

  13. Alexander DA, Ritchie E. Stressors’ and difficulties in dealing with the terminal patient. J Palliat Care. 1990;6:28–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gillman L, Adams J, Kovac R, Kilcullen A, House A, Doyle C. Strategies to promote coping and resilience in oncology and palliative care nurses caring for adult patients with malignancy: a comprehensive systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015;13:131–204. https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1898

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reinhard SC, Given B, Petlick NH, Bemis A. Supporting Family Caregivers in Providing Care 2008: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US).

  16. Prati G, Pietrantoni L, Cicognani E. Self-efficacy moderates the relationship between stress appraisal and quality of life among rescue workers. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2010;23:463–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800903431699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Davis KG, Kotowski SE. Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders for Nurses in Hospitals, Long-Term Care Facilities, and Home Health Care: a Comprehensive Review. Hum Factors. 2015;57:754–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815581933

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Griffiths H. Adverse risk: a ‘dynamic interaction model of patient moving and handling’. J Nurs Manag. 2012;20:713–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01276.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. DNQP. Erhaltung und Förderung der Mobilität in der Pflege: Expertenstandard nach § 113a SGB XI. 2020. http://www.dnqp.de. Accessed 11 Sep 2022.

  20. Cane F, Jennings R, Taylor J. A Rehabilitation Training Programme at the end of life. End of Life Journal. 2011;1:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/eoljnl-01-01.6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wahlstrom R, Nilsson-Wikmar L, Buer N. Nursing staff’s movement awareness, attitudes and reported behaviour in patient transfer before and after an educational intervention. Appl Ergon. 2011;42:455–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.09.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Taylor J, Hill H, Kay K. An integrated practice approach to mobility care for older people. Nurs Stand. 2016;30:51. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.30.29.51.s47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kollen BJ, Lennon S, Lyons B, Wheatley-Smith L, Scheper M, Buurke JH, et al. The effectiveness of the Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: what is the evidence? Stroke. 2009;40:97. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.533828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Imhof L, Suter-Riederer S, Kesselring J. Effects of mobility-enhancing nursing intervention in patients with MS and Stroke: Randomised Controlled Trial. Int Sch Res Notices. 2015;2015:785497. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/785497

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Fringer A, Huth M, Hantikainen V. Nurses’ experiences with the implementation of the Kinaesthetics movement competence training into elderly nursing care: a qualitative focus group study. Scand J Caring Sci. 2014;28:757–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gattinger H, Senn B, Hantikainen V, Köpke S, Ott S, Leino-Kilpi H. The self-reported and observed competence of nursing staff in mobility care based on Kinaesthetics in nursing homes - a cross-sectional study. Pflege. 2018;31:319–29. https://doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302/a000641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fringer A, Huth M, Hantikainen V. Nurses’ learning experiences with the Kinaesthetics Care Concept Training in a nursing home: a qualitative descriptive study. Educ Gerontol. 2015;41:888–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2015.1065684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Maurer C, Mayer H, Gattinger H. Faktoren, die die Implementierung von Kinästhetik in die stationäre Langzeitpflege beeinflussen: eine Konkretisierung des Consolidated Framework for implementation Research durch Expertenaussagen. HBScience. 2019;10:56–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s16024-019-00333-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Maurer C, Gattinger H, Mayer H. Difficulty of implementing kinaesthetics in long-term care institutions – A multiple case-study. Pflege. 2021;34:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302/a000780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hatch F, Maietta L, Kinästhetik. Gesundheitsentwicklung und menschliche Aktivitäten. 2nd ed. München, Jena: Urban und Fischer; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  31. European Kinaesthetics Association. Kinaesthetics. Lernen und Bewegungskompetenz. Linz, Winterthur: European Kinaesthetics Association; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Maurer C, Gattinger H. Kinästhetikkompetenz in der spezialisierten Palliative Care: Kinaesthetics competence in specialized palliative care: process evaluation of a quasi-experimental study. [Kinaesthetics competence in specialized palliative care: process evaluation of a quasi-experimental study]. Pflege. 2022;35:114–24. https://doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302/a000863

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, Tyrer P. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ. 2000;321:694–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h1258

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. European Kinaesthetics Association EKA. Kinaesthetics Bildungsweg. http://www.kinaesthetics.net/bildungsweg.cfm. Accessed 11 Sep 2022.

  36. Gattinger H, Senn B, Hantikainen V, Köpke S, Ott S, Leino-Kilpi H. Mobility care in nursing homes: development and psychometric evaluation of the kinaesthetics competence self-evaluation (KCSE) scale. BMC Nurs. 2017;16:67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-017-0257-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilbom A, Vinterberg H, Biering-Sorensen F, Andersson G, Jorgensen K. Standardised nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon. 1987;18:233–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In: Pajares F, Urdan TC, editors. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (adolescence and education). Information Age Publishing, Inc; 2006. pp. 307–37.

  39. Pugh JD, Gelder L, Williams AM, Twigg DE, Wilkinson AM, Blazevich AJ. Validity and reliability of an online extended version of the nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ-E2) to measure nurses’ fitness. J Clin Nurs. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gröben F, Freigang-Bauer I, Bös K. Leitfaden zur erfolgreichen Durchführung von Gesundheitsförderungsmaßnahmen im Betrieb: Schwerpunkt: Muskel-Skelett-Erkrankungen. 2004. http://www.infoline-gesundheitsfoerderung.de/. Accessed 11 Sep 2022.

  41. Grove SK, Burns NPD, Gray J. The practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence. 7th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bundesversammlung der Schweizerischen Eidgenossenschaft. Bundesgesetz über den Datenschutz: DSG; 1. März 2019.

  43. Haavisto E, Soikkeli-Jalonen A, Tonteri M, Hupli M. Nurses’ required end-of-life care competence in health centres inpatient ward - a qualitative descriptive study. Scand J Caring Sci. 2021;35:577–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Virdun C, Luckett T, Lorenz K, Davidson PM, Phillips J. Dying in the hospital setting: a meta-synthesis identifying the elements of end-of-life care that patients and their families describe as being important. Palliat Med. 2017;31:587–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216316673547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gattinger H, Siegl E, Senn B, Hantikainen V. Caregivers’ needs concerning mobility support of a family member with terminal cancer - a narrative review. Pflege. 2014;27:163–77. https://doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302/a000358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Andersen LL. Musculoskeletal disorders in the healthcare sector: Discussion paper. 2020. https://osha.europa.eu/

  47. Simon S, Higginson IJ. Evaluation of hospital palliative care teams: strengths and weaknesses of the before-after study design and strategies to improve it. Palliat Med. 2009;23:23–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216308098802

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. EdCaN. Competency assessment in nursing: A summary of literature published since 2000. 2008. http://edcan.org.au/assets/edcan/files/docs/EdCancompetenciesliteraturereviewFINAL_0.pdf

  49. Gattinger H, Leino-Kilpi H, Hantikainen V, Köpke S, Ott S, Senn B. Assessing nursing staff’s competences in mobility support in nursing-home care: development and psychometric testing of the Kinaesthetics competence (KC) observation instrument. BMC Nurs. 2016;15:65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-016-0185-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. BC Centre for Palliative Care. B.C. Inter-professional Palliative Symptom Management Guidelines. 2019. https://bc-cpc.ca/publications/symptom-management-guidelines/. Accessed 11 Sep 2022.

  51. Virdun C, Luckett T, Davidson PM, Phillips J. Dying in the hospital setting: a systematic review of quantitative studies identifying the elements of end-of-life care that patients and their families rank as being most important. Palliat Med. 2015;29:774–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216315583032

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Yassi A, Lockhart K. Work-relatedness of low back pain in nursing personnel: a systematic review. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2013;19:223–44. https://doi.org/10.1179/2049396713Y.0000000027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all palliative care nursing staff for their participation in our study.

Funding

This study was funded within the research programme “Research in Palliative Care” by Gottfried and Julia-Bangerter-Rhyner foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut of Applied Nursing Science, Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, Rosenbergstrasse 59, St. Gallen, Postfach, St. Gallen, 9001, Switzerland

    Heidrun Gattinger & Carola Maurer

  2. School of Management, Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, Rosenbergstrasse 59, St. Gallen, Postfach, St. Gallen, 9001, Switzerland

    Stefan Ott

  3. Kinaesthetics Schweiz, Zürcherstrasse 46, Winterthur, 8400, Switzerland

    Brigitte Marty-Teuber

  4. Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Turun yliopisto, 20014, Finland

    Virpi Hantikainen

  5. ZHAW School of Health Sciences, Institute of Nursing, Katharina-Sulzer-Platz 9, Winterthur, 8400, Switzerland

    André Fringer

Authors
  1. Heidrun Gattinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefan Ott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carola Maurer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Brigitte Marty-Teuber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Virpi Hantikainen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. André Fringer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HG, SO, CM, BMT, VH, AF conceived and developed the study protocol. HG recruited the study subjects. HG and BMT trained and supervised the intervention facilitators (Kinaesthetics trainer). HG and CM performed the quantitative assessment. SO and HG performed the quantitative analysis. HG and SO, drafted the article, and all authors contributed substantially to its revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heidrun Gattinger.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was submitted and approved on 09/05/2017 by the “Ethikkommission Ostschweiz” (reference number 2017 − 00721). A written informed consent was obtained from all the study participants. The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki, the Good Clinical Practice guidelines, and local regulatory requirements.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gattinger, H., Ott, S., Maurer, C. et al. Effect of an educational intervention on nurses’ competence in activities of daily living support in end-of-life care using a pretest–posttest repeated measures design. BMC Palliat Care 22, 119 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01232-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01232-2

Keywords

BMC Palliative Care

ISSN: 1472-684X

Contact us